In Serbian, and I'm sure this covers Croatian and Bosnian, double negations are the norm. Most of the time, the offical and only way to say something is with double negative. Sometimes, it is used only to emphasize. I have browsed some online forums first to get some ideas and examples.

Serbian (<em>literal</em>) translation

Ne znam ništa (<em>I don't know nothing</em>) I don't know anything
Neću ništa (<em>I don't want nothing</em>) I don't want anything
Ne razumem ništa (<em>I don't understand nothing</em>) I don't understand anything
Nikada nije bio tamo (<em>Never he wasn't there</em>) He was never there
Ne vodi nigde (<em>It doesn't lead nowhere</em>) It doesn't lead anywhere / It leads/goes nowhere
Ne veruj nikome (<em>Don't trust nobody</em>) Don't trust anyone / Trust noone
Nisam nezahvalan (<em>I am not ungrateful</em>) - [This is used for emphasis, same as in English]
Nisam video nikoga (<em>I haven't seen nobody</em>) I haven't seen anyone
Nigde nema nikoga (<em>Nowhere isn't nobody</em>) There isn't anybody anywhere [This is like a triple negation]

<em>(continued)</em>

To the best of my understanding & knowledge it is not possible to negate twice in Hindi.

Looking at this list, it's the English distinction with "<em>any-</em>" words that make all the difference and avoid double negation. In Serbian those words are usually two separate words that translate more like whatever, whoever and wherever:
<em>nothing / anything</em> = ništa / bilo šta
<em>nobody / anybody</em> = niko / bilo ko
<em>nowhere / anywhere</em> = nigde / bilo gde

I've found an interesting post where someone explains how the double negation came together by using these two examples:
1a) Nema ikog (<em>There isn't anyone</em>) - 1b) Ima nikog (<em>There is noone</em>)
2a) Ništa zna (<em>He knows nothing</em>) - 2b) Sve ne zna (<em>He doesn't know everything</em>)

Both examples in each permutation have one subject or verb that is crucial from which the rest of the sentence and meaning can be correctly assumed. In 1a it is "nema / isn't", in 1b it is "nikog / noone", in 2a it's "ništa / nothing" and in 2b "ne zna/ doesn't know". He concludes that "in Serbian there is no logical double negation but a phrase which came together by combining two simple logical and mutually supportive negations."

(continued)

Nuryanur, in your example there is one negative particle "не" and then three negative nouns (though, it is still argued whether ни as a prefix is really negative. The sentence could perfectly be without any of the three or with any of the three nouns and the sentence is still possible. I do not understand what is it that you want me to say about it.

Nacir, what language are you referring to? If you are referring to English, I know it is possible to do that, I want to stick to the structure "Subject + negative particle/negative verb + negative/neutral noun", and compare that sole structure in different languages of the Indo-European family.