This is the question Iggy Azalea, and American pop singer was asked with her boyfriend, Nick Young. I think it's an interesting question.
If you could live in a house by the sea, or choose an underwater home surrounded by fish, which would you prefer?
Hi everyone, I think a house underwater is just like you have a huge fishbowl in ordinary house, or like you are running a TV show about "life underwater" in a large screen, there are no real feelings except the sights. On the other hand when you live by beach you will enjoy sensed things like fresh breezes, water, swimming, sand, natural sights etc.. Beside if you interested in fish and underwater world, when you live near the sea it’s easy to go diving whenever you want.
For me, underwater house may will be interesting for couple of days at the beginning, but I can’t live my entire life there, it will be like prison. So, I prefer to live by sea. :)
would be awesome to have an underwater home, I imagine me sitting there, watching the life in the sea, relaxing, may some tea, or reading a book...
fortunate them that they've got the money to have a house like that!!
I think the novelty of being underwater would wear off pretty fast. I cringe at the maintenance costs and procedures. I'll take a house by the sea.
Living underwater is nicer i think ;)
I usually prefer mountains, lakes, and forests, but I think I'd want the best of both worlds. A house by the beach, but with an underwater living room to relax in.