Community Web Version Now Available
What is left out in this sentence? Hi there, Does this sentence make sense? He is not only annoying but also my brother. 'Me' might be left out after annoying. Do you think so? Thank you.I mean 'me' might have been left out after annoying. The original sentence is 'He is not only annoying but also my brother.'
May 28, 2013 6:58 AM
Answers · 9
The meaning changes if you remove "me". It's still a legitimate sentence, but it's not the one you started with. If you say, "He is not only annoying me but also my brother," then you're specifying that he is specifically an annoyance to you (POSSIBLY: read below for an explanation on why this may not be the case). 'Annoying', in that sentence, is a verb. If you say, "He is not only annoying but also my brother," then you're now saying that being annoying is a general trait of his: that he is an annoyance to EVERYONE at all times instead of simply being annoying to you for a temporary period. 'Annoying', in that sentence, is an adjective. Of course, in either case, I'd recommend making it a compound sentence. While what you wrote is acceptable, it's also weird-sounding. And it's very ambiguous if you include 'me', because you can also read it as "He is not only annoying me, but he's also annoying my brother" instead of "He's not only annoying me, but he is also my brother". Both of those interpretations are entirely legitimate and could only be deduced through context (something that a sentence like this likely would not have). By putting a comma before the 'but' and fully forming a second sentence, you can specify whether 'he' is the man annoying you and your brother OR whether 'he' IS your annoying brother.
May 28, 2013
No, no need for 'me'. Take the sentence as amusing, putting together two unrelated or opposing or seemingly ridiculous things to make a kind of paradox. It's a joking sentence.
May 28, 2013
There is no 'me' to remove - did you mean 'Insert me'?
May 28, 2013
Language Skills
Chinese (Mandarin), English
Learning Language