So did the writer say that we can have detached perspectives in the class room or the cafe? In principle, one could have theories about how the world works without caring what happens or who wins. But outside the classroom and the cafe, few of us adopt this detached perspective. Usually our theories and assumptions about how the social, political, and economic worlds work are parts of a larger narrative organized around themes of justice and injustice, freedom and oppression, saved and sinner, purity and corruption, and so on. 1)outside the classroom and the cafe, few of us adopt this detached perspective. So did the writer say that we can have detached perspectives in the class room or the cafe? Why did the writer say like this?