Vicky
I am puzzled. Whether or not visual observations from ships and airplanes, observations using underwater vehicles, manned or not, acoustics and finally trawling will provide the necessary detail to characterise litter and eventually define sources is not always clear. And I want to know what is "not always clear."
Jan 21, 2017 8:48 AM
Answers · 6
What is 'not clear' is whether all those techniques (airplanes, acoustics etc.) for observing litter in the oceans will lead to an answer about what exactly the litter is (its 'character') and where it comes from (its 'source'). It's a pretty complicated sentence even for native speakers I think!
January 21, 2017
Thank @ Dr. Steven Jefferson.
January 30, 2017
It's a REALLY badly constructed sentence. Grammatically it is RUBBISH. Where did you FIND this AWFUL sentence?????
January 21, 2017
The sentence is not particularly well constructed. This would work better: Whether or not visual observations from ships and airplanes, observations using underwater vehicles, manned or not, acoustics and finally trawling will provide the necessary detail to characterise litter and eventually define sources is not always clear. Whether or not visual observations (e.g. from ships, aircraft or manned or unmanned submersibles), acoustic scanning technologies (such as sonar), or physical trawling (or dredging) will ever be capable of delivering the detailed data necessary to categorise specific pieces of litter (flotsam and jetsam) and trace them back to their sources is by no means clear. Or better still: Various technologies, including X,Y &Z are currently being used in the attempt to categorise specific pieces of litter (flotsam and jetsam) and trace them back to their sources. Whether any of these will ever prove successful, however, remains to be seen.
January 21, 2017
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!