박찬희
Hello~ Today i have two questions. 1. It can help the enviroment to be reduce the use of damaging. 2. It can help the enviroment by reducing the use of damaging. Are two sentences same of meaning? and 3. GM could give a few huge companies a dangerous monopoly on global food production. 4. GM could give a few huge companies to be dangerous monopoly on a global food production. which sentences is it right?
Oct 24, 2017 5:06 AM
Answers · 2
2and3 is right
October 24, 2017
"1. It can help the environment to be reduce the use of damaging. /// This is incorrect. 2. It can help the environment by reducing the use of damaging. /// This is almost correct. "It can help the environment by reducing the use of damaging products" Or even better "It can help the environment to reduce the use of damaging products" It depends on what you want to say, exactly. "If you use your car less it will help the environment" 3. GM could give a few huge companies a dangerous monopoly on global food production. /// Correct 4. GM could give a few huge companies to be dangerous monopoly on a global food production. /// Incorrect
October 24, 2017
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!