Cathy
Which of the two sentences is correct? 1. The concert was about to start at seven o'clock, but the conductor didn't come until half past seven. 2. The concert was due to start at seven o'clock, but the conductor didn't come until half past seven. Which of the two sentences is correct? And what's the differnce between "be about to do sth." and "be due to do sth."?
Nov 4, 2019 8:59 AM
Answers · 10
3
The correct sentence is the second one: "The concert was due to start at seven o'clock, but the conductor didn't come until half past seven." This means that the concert was scheduled to start at seven o'clock, but in fact it didn't start then. The start of the concert was delayed because of the late arrival of the conductor. The first sentence does not make any real sense. 'About to start' describes a situation at a particular moment, when something was on the point of happening. For example, you might say this: "It was seven o'clock and the concert was about to start. The orchestra members were ready to play and the audience was waiting. Then somebody realised that the conductor had not arrived."
November 4, 2019
Hi Cathy! 1. The concert was about to start at seven o'clock, but the conductor didn't come until half past seven.
November 4, 2019
Because 'due to' should only be used as an adjective and After a noun. So in here we can used 'about to'.
November 4, 2019
The second sentence IS right, Cathy. See my answer below!
November 4, 2019
Thank you for your help! But why is the second sentence wrong? I still feel confused. According to my understanding if something is due at a particular time , it is expected to happen at that time. There is the usage of "be due to do sth". For example: The committee was due to meet on October 1st. I think in the second sentence "the concert was arranged or expected to" start at seven o'clock is acceptable.
November 4, 2019
Show more
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!