Pesquise entre vários professores de Inglês...
Alexander
Is it correct that in “I wouldn't be sure that it was profitable in 5 years” we don't need the second “would” when talking about the future relative to “be sure”?
2 de ago de 2026 04:40
Respostas · 12
2
Yes, that's correct.
After expressions such as "I wouldn't be sure", "I don't think", or "I doubt", we often use the past tense to refer to a future situation from the speaker's point of view.
So:
"I wouldn't be sure that it was profitable in five years."
is perfectly natural.
You could also say:
"I wouldn't be sure that it would be profitable in five years."
if you want to emphasise the future outcome itself, but the second "would" is optional rather than required.
In other words, the first version is completely grammatical and is probably the more natural choice in everyday English.
2 de ago de 2026 17:04
1
I agree with Gareth Todd.
2 de ago de 2026 17:33
1
Your phrase is okay but native speakers might say "I'm not sure that it will be profitable in 5 years."
That's right, no 2nd would needed.
2 de ago de 2026 08:19
Ainda não encontrou suas respostas?
Escreva suas perguntas e deixe os falantes nativos ajudá-lo!
Alexander
Habilidades linguísticas
Inglês, Ucraniano
Idioma de aprendizado
Inglês
Artigos que Você Pode Gostar Também

How to Work Effectively with International Teams
10 votados positivos · 2 Comentários

Why Do People Still Ask You to Repeat Yourself?
21 votados positivos · 11 Comentários

Why Your English Textbooks Didn’t Prepare You for Fast-Paced Meetings
18 votados positivos · 8 Comentários
Mais artigos
