Pesquise entre vários professores de Inglês...
GotoBrazil
Why to use "read" rather than "readS"? “Mao must be portrayed as great and glorious. He must not be besmirched,” read one popular comment.
11 de jul de 2021 15:57
Respostas · 9
2
It is using “read” as the past tense of read. It seems that the comment was already posted so the author used the past tense. you can say, “Mao must be portrayed as great and glorious. He must not be besmirched,” reads one popular comment. which means the same thing but in the present. .
11 de julho de 2021
2
It sounds like this is in the passive voice. Read (pronounced “reed”) becomes read (pronounced “red”) in the passive voice. Hope that helps!
11 de julho de 2021
1
This is a good question. Asad''s example is correct. The problem is that we spell the word "read" the same, even when we pronounce it differently. You could say it in 2 ways: Reads = (pronounced like reeeeeeeeeeeeeeds" )puts it in the present. Read = ( pronounced like "red") puts it in the past. Either one makes sense. Our spelling system can be confusing sometimes.
11 de julho de 2021
1
It's similar to reported speech, so you're telling me about something someone else said, so it is in the past tense. ReadS is a present tense form.
11 de julho de 2021
你好,有唔有興趣一齊學習英文?我想搵個夥伴齊齊學習
13 de julho de 2021
Ainda não encontrou suas respostas?
Escreva suas perguntas e deixe os falantes nativos ajudá-lo!

Não perca a oportunidade de aprender uma língua no conforto da sua casa. Navegue pela nossa seleção de professores de línguas experientes e inscreva-se na sua primeira aula agora mesmo!