Pesquise entre vários professores de Inglês...
Ryota
I've learned that after subordinate conjunctions a subject can be omitted when the subject matches the one in the main clause.
I recognize “than” as a subordinate conjunction, but in the subordinate clause in the sentence below it is ‘land and water’ that is omitted. Not ‘they’. Why is that possible?
“Plant-based meats have been gaining popularity. One U.S. company is using mushroom root to make its
products. They use less land and water than is needed to raise animal meat and produce, which in turn lowers greenhouse gas emissions.”
17 de dez de 2023 13:11
Respostas · 4
The subjects do not match. Also, "than" is used as a preposition in your sentence, not a conjunction. "Than" is used to introduce the second element in a comparison. The word "is" superfluous, plays no role, and you can omit it: "less land and water than needed". The subordinate clause has no subject and no verb.
17 de dezembro de 2023
You've got the right idea. To replace all the words that have been omitted for the sake of brevity would make the sentence repetitive and overly wordy:
They use less land and water than the amount of land and water that is needed to raise animal meat and produce, which in turn lowers greenhouse gas emissions.”
17 de dezembro de 2023
Ainda não encontrou suas respostas?
Escreva suas perguntas e deixe os falantes nativos ajudá-lo!
Ryota
Habilidades linguísticas
Inglês, Japonês
Idioma de aprendizado
Inglês
Artigos que Você Pode Gostar Também

Santa, St. Nicholas, or Father Christmas? How Christmas Varies Across English-Speaking Countries
6 votados positivos · 4 Comentários

Reflecting on Your Progress: Year-End Language Journal Prompts
5 votados positivos · 2 Comentários

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
25 votados positivos · 18 Comentários
Mais artigos
