Please help check the grammar. Any advice on my arguments would be appreciated as well. Thank you. “Corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location. Even in the recent recession, Helios’s unemployment rate was lower than the regional average. It is the industrial center of the region, and historically it has provided more than its share of the region’s manufacturing jobs. In addition, Helios is attempting to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies.” Here's my analysis of the article:   At first glance, the argument of the article seems somewhat convincing, but a close examination will reveal how groundless it actually is. The author of this article claims that corporations should choose Helios as an ideal location to develop their business. In support of this recommendation, the author points out that Helios’s unemployment rate was lower than the regional average while in the recent recession. Furthermore, Helios is attempting to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies. However, I do not agree with this view, because it suffers from 3 critical flaws. First, the author uses unemployment rate to determine whether a place is congenial for companies. This method appears to be problematic. To elaborate, if a place has a very low unemployment rate, then new companies must have difficulties finding their prospective employees and thus lack of sufficient manpower. In aggregate terms, the author is wrong by using the opposite data to gauge whether or not a place is suitable for companies. Secondly, depending on the past data to make a decision about future career seems to be somewhat careless. The reason is that it is unpredictable when it comes to the future, and it is hard to prognosticate what future economic environment is, what future trend is or even what people think of later on. Therefore, the author cannot only rely on the past performance of Helios to claim that Helios is the most appropriate location for companies. Last but not least, even if those author’s assumptions found to be true, the author fails to consider the characteristic of corporations. At the end of the article, the author mentions that Helios wish to attract corporations that focus on new technology, so Helios doesn’t welcome all kinds of industries. ...(omit)