[Usuário desativado]
Supposed to VS Suppose to Sorry again for this stupid grammar question... I don't wanna look up on internet today, I'm too lazy...　٩(๑`^´๑)۶ Are these two sentences grammatically correct? What am I suppose to tell you? What was I supposed to tell you? Please give me some examplezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzz
25 de out de 2018 11:14
Respostas · 7
3
Hi Snoop, 'What am I suppose to tell you?' is incorrect The second is correct. Examples: What do you suppose Linus did when Snoopy washed his blanket? Snoopy: 'Linus' blanket was so dirty, what else was I supposed to do - use it on my sofa? Hope this helps :-) Martin
25 de outubro de 2018
1
'suppose to' doesn't exist both sentences should be 'supposed to' - the tense is not important :)
25 de outubro de 2018
1
The expression "supposed to", if you want to describe what someone should do, is always spelled "supposed to" and not "suppose to". It always goes with a form of the verb "to be" ("He was supposed to do ...............", or "She's not supposed to do ........").
25 de outubro de 2018
Ainda não encontrou suas respostas?
Escreva suas perguntas e deixe os falantes nativos ajudá-lo!
Artigos que Você Pode Gostar Também
Phone and Video Call English: Sounding Confident Remotely
5 votados positivos · 0 Comentários
How to Handle Difficult Conversations at Work
3 votados positivos · 0 Comentários
English for Awkward Moments: What to Say When You Don’t Know What to Say
42 votados positivos · 28 Comentários
Mais artigos