Pesquise entre vários professores de Inglês...
[Usuário desativado]
Supposed to VS Suppose to
Sorry again for this stupid grammar question... I don't wanna look up on internet today, I'm too lazy... ٩(๑`^´๑)۶
Are these two sentences grammatically correct?
What am I suppose to tell you?
What was I supposed to tell you?
Please give me some examplezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzz
25 de out de 2018 11:14
Respostas · 7
3
Hi Snoop,
'What am I suppose to tell you?' is incorrect
The second is correct.
Examples:
What do you suppose Linus did when Snoopy washed his blanket?
Snoopy: 'Linus' blanket was so dirty, what else was I supposed to do - use it on my sofa?
Hope this helps :-)
Martin
25 de outubro de 2018
1
'suppose to' doesn't exist
both sentences should be 'supposed to' - the tense is not important
:)
25 de outubro de 2018
1
The expression "supposed to", if you want to describe what someone should do, is always spelled "supposed to" and not "suppose to". It always goes with a form of the verb "to be" ("He was supposed to do ...............", or "She's not supposed to do ........").
25 de outubro de 2018
Ainda não encontrou suas respostas?
Escreva suas perguntas e deixe os falantes nativos ajudá-lo!
Artigos que Você Pode Gostar Também

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
22 votados positivos · 17 Comentários

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
17 votados positivos · 12 Comentários

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
14 votados positivos · 6 Comentários
Mais artigos
