Pesquise entre vários professores de Inglês...
Postagens
writing task 2 16/9/15 Being a celebrity- such as a movie star or professional athlete- brings problems as a well as benefits. Do you think that being a celebrity brings has more benefits or drawbacks? Famous people like film actors and actresses or elite sportsman and sportswomen, suffer from worries as they have privileges because of their position. In my opinion the advantages of being a welll known fellow, such as greater income and being admired, outnimber the disadvantages. In this essay will be reviewed why I think being a celebrity brings more money and support, and will be made a conclussion. First must be highlighted that notorious persons eran more money, which alllow hem to live with better comfort. For instance evry Real Madrid player lives in a house with six or more rooms, according to the sports newspaper Marca. However to be so wealthy could make these people incapable of giving cash its real value, spending money unnecessarily in stupid things. Moreover media and sport stars feel themselves how is to have a lot of supporters and fans. That is to say they can count on many people that will followthem in the good and bad times. For example tenis player Nadla stated recently in a TV interview that when he lost a match his inconditioanl fans always cheered him up with social media messages. Sometimes, however, the same persons who admire a celebrity can change to hate him or her very fast, so famous peoplecan't realy in being suppperted by therir followers all life. In conclussion the positive issues of being a notorious persons, like bigger salaries and admiration from masses, compensate the drawbacks.
16 de setembro de 2015
3
0
IELTS writing task 2. About crime It is a recurrent topic that if the criminal spent more time in prison ther would be less felonies. However many lawers and judges think that there are other resources to decrease the number of crimes. It is agreed by many that if potential criminals are afraid of being punished with a long time in jail, they will think it twice befer conmit crime. Moreover there are certain crimes, like serial killing or child molestation that deserve a severe punishment. However the countries with harder sentences don´t have less crime rates, for instance US have life sentences but it doesn´t reduce crime rates with regard Europe. In order to reduce the amount of citizens that break the law there are ther strategies. Many think that the better place to start is at school, teaching how to behaviour in society. IN spite of all the preemptive actions, some will not follow the law and willl have to be punished. But instead using longer prison sentences, it would be of more benefit to show them alternatives wayas of making a living, for example teching them a new job. In conclusion, there are many felonies that deserve to spend a time in prison. In spite of this justice shouldn´t center in longer sentences but in convince the criminals not to break the law, or once they do, convince them not to do it again. In order to accomplish this there are any ways, like educational programs in school or adding them new skills when they are inmprisoned. Finally I can´t agree with the statement that harder punishment means more security
15 de setembro de 2015
3
0