Über mich Ich heiße Diana. Ich komme aus der Ukraine. Ich wohne in der Stadt. Ich spreche Ukrainisch, Englisch und Russisch. Ich habe Papageien und Katzen.

I can teach you Ukrainian or Russian for free

Could you correct my essay, please? Question: People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. People study at university for many different reasons. I think the most important is to obtain new knowledge and good skills, but, of course, there are also a lot of other reasons students go to college, such as to make new friends or get good job in the future. However, I suppose that people enter the university because of the following reasons. Everybody wants to have nice job, so they have to get new knowledge and increase their skills, and universities help people to do it. Therefore, by attending them, people can get careers easier. Besides everyone will be fully prepared for their work after graduation. This is the first thing why I suppose that people study at colleges and universities. Secondly, some people attend university just to make more new friends. They enjoy their lives in colleges, because they can meet people that have similar interests and hobbies with themselves. The third reason why in my opinion students enter the schools is to gain more knowledge. Studying is such an interesting thing that make our lives rich and colorful. Furthermore, as technology advances in our world, it is necessary for people to have more and more education. In conclusion, there are many factors that may influence people’s decision attend the university: some may attend it for new experience, and others just to make new friends.

Could you correct my essay, please? Question: People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. People study at university for many different reasons. I think the most important is to obtain new knowledge and good skills, but, of course, there are also a lot of other reasons students go to college, such as to make new friends or get good job in the future. However, I suppose that people enter the university because of the following reasons. Everybody wants to have nice job, so they have to get new knowledge and increase their skills, and universities help people to do it. Therefore, by attending them, people can get careers easier. Besides everyone will be fully prepared for their work after graduation. This is the first thing why I suppose that people study at colleges and universities. Secondly, some people attend university just to make more new friends. They enjoy their lives in colleges, because they can meet people that have similar interests and hobbies with themselves. The third reason why in my opinion students enter the schools is to gain more knowledge. Studying is such an interesting thing that make our lives rich and colorful. Furthermore, as technology advances in our world, it is necessary for people to have more and more education. In conclusion, there are many factors that may influence people’s decision attend the university: some may attend it for new experience, and others just to make new friends.

Could you correct my essay, please? Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Would you like to be taught by teacher, that has not good knowledge of the subject being taught? I think, the most people will answer “no”, because if someone want to study with a teacher’s help, he or she will hope, that professor have great knowing and experience on this discipline. So I do not agree with the statement above, that a teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught, for couple of reasons. Firstly, teachers’ job is to educate students with their knowledge. The ability to relate well with children is something that counselor should possess. That is why teachers with amazing knowing of the subject they teach can obtain an award. Professors who can get along with their students but have not knowledge are usually more popular and liked by children, but I suppose a teacher with no knowledge is a truly bad teacher. Secondly, students go to school to learn something new from their teacher, but not to relate well with others (it is, of course, important, but after all studying is more serious). I know an old Biology teacher, who is really clever and teach students well enough, but a lot of children complain that her lessons are boring and uninteresting, because she never entertains her students. However, she has a lot of knowledge and even have a few awards for teaching, which make learners to believe that her way of teaching is excellent. In conclusion, I guess the most important quality every teacher must have is brilliant knowing of the subject he or she teaches, but not the ability to relate well and get along with students.

Could you correct my essay, please? Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Would you like to be taught by teacher, that has not good knowledge of the subject being taught? I think, the most people will answer “no”, because if someone wants to study with a teacher’s help, he or she will hope, that professor has great knowing and experience on this discipline. So I do not agree with the statement above, that a teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught, for couple of reasons. Firstly, teachers’ job is to educate students with their knowledge. The ability to relate well with children is something that counselor should possess. That is why teachers with amazing knowing of the subject they teach can obtain an award. Professors who can get along with their students but have not knowledge are usually more popular and liked by children, but I suppose a teacher with no knowledge is a truly bad teacher. Secondly, students go to school to learn something new from their teacher, but not to relate well with others (it is, of course, important, but after all studying is more serious). I know an old Biology teacher, who is really clever and teach students well enough, but a lot of children complain that her lessons are boring and uninteresting, because she never entertains her students. However, she has a lot of knowledge and even have a few awards for teaching, which make learners to believe that her way of teaching is excellent. In conclusion, I guess the most important quality every teacher must have is brilliant knowing of the subject he or she teaches, but not the ability to relate well and get along with students.

Could you check my essay, please? Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. “It is true, that television and advertising strongly influences our minds, especially directed toward young children (aged two to five), so it should not be allowed”, - a lot of people, especially elderly, consider so. As for me, it is completely untrue information. Thus, I totally disagree with the statement above, and, in my opinion, television advertising directed toward little kids should be allowed for a few reasons. First, it may be very useful for parents. It is a way to show what toys can be interesting for babies and what is new in this industry. For example, some people, that have children, say, that advertising really helps them to choose products for their daughters and sons. In their words they just have not anyone, who can advise them something or their parents are old-fashioned. Second, some people think, that advertising influence a child’s mind in a wrong way, and if kids see it, they will ask about buying advertised product. However, not every parents can afford such purchases, so children may begin to cry, behave badly, and even insist, because they do not think about a price of toys. Besides, some people assume that television advertising may teach children bad things. But I suppose, it is not a big problem. First of all, adults can control their children, and let them watch only the advertising they want, so government should not prohibit all of it. Secondly, such little kids under the age of five usually do not pay much attention to the advertising they see, and moreover analyze it. As a result, even though there are a lot of facts against television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five), I guess that it should be allowed because it can be truly useful and helpful for both children and parents.

Could you check my essay, please? Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. “It is true, that television and advertising strongly influences our minds, especially directed toward young children (aged two to five), so it should not be allowed”, - a lot of people, especially elderly, consider so. As for me, it is completely untrue information. Thus, I totally disagree with the statement above, and, in my opinion, television advertising directed toward little kids should be allowed for a few reasons. First, it may be very useful for parents. It is a way to show what toys can be interesting for babies and what is new in this industry. For example, some people, that have children, say, that advertising really helps them to choose products for their daughters and sons. In their words they just have not anyone, who can advise them something or their parents are old-fashioned. Second, some people think, that advertising influence a child’s mind in a wrong way, and if kids see it, they will ask about buying advertised product. However, not every parent can afford such purchases, so children may begin to cry, behave badly, and even insist, because they do not think about a price of toys. Besides, some people assume that television advertising may teach children bad things. But I suppose, it is not a big problem. First of all, adults can control their children, and let them watch only the advertising they want, so government should not prohibit all of it. Secondly, such little kids under the age of five usually do not pay much attention to the advertising they see, and moreover analyze it. As a result, even though there are a lot of facts against television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five), I guess that it should be allowed because it can be truly useful and helpful for both children and parents.

What is the difference between the words "institute" and "establish"?