Çeşitli İngilizce öğretmenleri arasından arama yapın...
Sandy Lu
Please help check if there is any unnatural expressions Interviews form the basic selecting procedure for largest companies. However, some people believe interview is not a reliable mean of choosing who to employ and there are some other better methods of selection. Do you agree or disagree? __________ Undoubtedly, interviewing has been the most common method of screening talents for ages. Even though some people argued that it may not be trustworthy, I personally totally disagree with this statement. The drawbacks of interviews are pointed out by some HRs or employers who complain that new employees’ abilities sometimes are not matched with their exaggerated or even fake CVs. This concern can be justified as employers have no idea about the new comers who are total strangers to them, therefore, they might make the wrong decision. Consequently, they might turn to their own social circles in order to hunt for the right person, who they believe is much more reliable. However, I hold the view that the largest companies should still stick to this conventional way of employment. Firstly, big companies usually have numerous positions to fill, which means that the number of applicants recommended by their acquaintances might not satisfy their demands. Secondly, some talents may be omitted because of their lack of social skills. Programmers are a good example of this. They are often described as nerdy and introverted, as a result, they tend not to appear in any social circle. If employers took the approach of meeting them through acquaintances, these talents might be ignored, which could be a huge loss. To solve the problem of choosing the wrong person, I would suggest that employers take more caution in terms of background investigation for potential employees. Further solutions include assigning more qualified professionals to interview applicants. In conclusion, although there are certain downsides to interviews, I think that with a more scientific approach, this traditional way of employment can be useful for the largest companies to hire the most suitable person.
12 Ağu 2020 04:35
Düzeltmeler · 1
Please help check if there is any unnatural expressions

Interviews form the basic selecting/selection procedure for largest companies. However, some people believe interview <s style="color: rgb(230, 0, 0);">is </s>are not a reliable means of choosing who to employ and there are <s style="color: rgb(230, 0, 0);">some </s>other better methods/alternatives of selection. Do you agree or disagree?
__________

Undoubtedly, interviewing has been the most common method of screening talents for <s style="color: rgb(230, 0, 0);">ages </s>1* years. Even though some people argue<s style="color: rgb(230, 0, 0);">d</s>2* that it may not be trustworthy, I personally totally disagree with this statement.

The drawbacks of interviews are pointed out by some HRs or employers who complain that new employees’ abilities sometimes are not matched with/by their exaggerated or even fake CVs. This concern can be justified as employers have no idea about the new comers/employees 3* who are total strangers to them, therefore, they might make the wrong decision. Consequently, they might turn to their own social circles in order to hunt for the right person, who they believe is much more reliable.

However, I hold the view that the largest companies should still stick to this conventional way of <s style="color: rgb(230, 0, 0);">employment </s>4* hiring / recriutment / giving employment. Firstly, big companies usually have numerous positions to fill, which means that the number of applicants recommended by their acquaintances might not satisfy their demand<s style="color: rgb(230, 0, 0);">s </s>5* /needs. Secondly, some talents may be omitted because of their lack of social skills. Programmers are a good example of this. They are often described as nerdy and introverted, as a result, they tend not to appear in any social circle. If employers took the approach of meeting them through acquaintances, these talents might be ignored, which could be a huge loss.

To solve the problem of choosing the wrong person, I would suggest that employers take more caution/are more careful / take more care in terms of background investigation for potential employees. Further solutions include assigning more qualified professionals to interview applicants.

In conclusion, although there are certain downsides to interviews, I think that with a more scientific approach, this traditional way of <s style="color: rgb(230, 0, 0);">employment </s><em>hiring/ recruitment </em>can be useful for the largest companies to hire the most suitable person.

 
<em>1* for ages is correct but too informal here</em>
<em>2* why past?</em>
<em>3* new comers is used more for people who are not familiar with a system /place to contrast with those who have been there for a longer time and therefore observe the same rules/ conventions. eg The town has grown dramatically in size over the last few years. Although the new comers have brought business and dynamism some of the older residents feel they are noisy and untidy. </em>
<em>4* - way of employment sounds more like - on-line / part time, etc, </em>
<em>5*- demand - in quantity of how much is needed / demands - conditions that you put on negotiation. eg the criminals wanted the police to satisfy their demands before they would release the hostages. </em>

21 Ağustos 2020
Daha hızlı mı ilerlemek istiyorsun?
Bu öğrenme topluluğuna katıl ve ücretsiz alıştırmaları dene!

Evden çıkmadan dil öğrenme fırsatını kaçırmayın. Deneyimli dil eğitmenlerimizden oluşan seçkimize göz atın ve ilk dersinize şimdi kaydolun!