Home Education vs School Education
Yet another IELTS writing task II. Anyone volunteers to help? Thank you very much in advance.
Question:
Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child’s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school.
Answer:
In general, most Chinese parents send their children to schools to study. Some, however, believe that educating children at home can also be a good idea. Which one is better for children’s development?
The advantages for children to learning in schools are obvious. To begin with, teachers in schools are trained professionals specializing in this area. They not only have the knowledge of the subjects they teach, but also the experiences of coping with a large number of children. Secondly, since no individual can be good at all subjects, it is a big challenge for parents to teach all subjects. But different teachers in schools possess different expertise of a wide range of fields, so they are more competent. Lastly, in schools, children have the opportunities to play with their peers similar in age, which brings them a lot of pleasure. Meanwhile, they can learn to socialize with their classmates, and this skill is essential to their adult life.
On the other hand, sometimes learning at home is more favourable to children. In many remote and impoverished villages in China, for example, it is unaffordable or unpractical to send children to schools. In that case, home-based education is the only solution. Besides, some parents believe that they are more reliable than teachers. Teachers occasionally make mistakes and are unwilling to confess, but most parents will for the sake of their children. They are also worried that their children can be neglected or bullied in schools. Moreover, in homes, children can enjoy more love from their families. This can help to nourish children’s sense of belonging and to enhance cooperation and friendship between siblings. When they grow up, they can help each other better. Because siblings are the most reliable friends in the world, it is wise to build the do solidarity in their youth.
In conclusion, there is no pat answer to the question of which one is better. Parents should consider the merits of both options carefully before making a decision.
Great work.
Comments: "have the experiences" is not wrong, but does not read as well.
Having experience of teaching many children does no0t seem relevant to teaching 1 child at home.
to socialize with their classmates, and this skill is essential to their adult life. OK
to socialize with their classmates a skill essential to their adult life. <-- maybe better
You can "send children to schools", but "send children to school" seems better, unless you want to stress that there are multiple schools.
Home Eudcation Education vs School Education
Yet another IELTS <a id="FALINK_2_0_1" class="FAtxtL" href="#">writing</a> task II. Anyone volunteers to help? Thank you very much in advance.
Question:
Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child’s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school.
Answer:
In general, most Chinese parents send their children to schools to study. Some, however, believe that educating children at home can also be a good idea. Which one is better for children’s development?
The advantages for to children to learning in schools are obvious. To begin with, teachers in schools are trained professionals specializing in this area. They not only have the knowledge of the subjects they teach, but also the experiences of coping with a large number of children. Secondly, since no individual can be good at all subjects, it is a big challenge for parents to teach all subjects. But different teachers in schools possess different expertise of a wide range of fields, so they are more competent. Lastly, in schools, children have the <a id="FALINK_3_0_2" class="FAtxtL" href="#">opportunities</a> to play with their peers similar in age, which brings them a lot of pleasure. Meanwhile, they can learn to socialize with their classmates, and this skill is essential to their adult life.
On the other hand, sometimes learning at home is more favourable favorable to children. In many remote and impoverished villages in China, for example, it is unaffordable or unpractical impractical to send children to schools. In that these cases, home-based education is the only solution. Besides, some parents believe that they are more reliable than teachers. Teachers occasionally make mistakes and are unwilling to confess, but most parents will for the sake of their children. They are also worried that their children can be neglected or bullied in schools. Moreover, in homes, children can enjoy more love from their families. This can help to nourish children’s sense of belonging and to enhance cooperation and friendship between siblings. When they grow up, they can help each other better. Because siblings are the most reliable friends in the world, it is wise to build the do solidarity in their youth.
In conclusion, there is no pat answer to the question of which one option is better. Parents should consider the merits of both options carefully before making a decision.
