(2/2)

Once, I went to my work without using a car. It was a horrible experience. The experience was horrible, because I was waiting the bus to come over one and half hour. Moreover, the travel to work took two hours. When I arrived in my work. I was very tired and very exhausted. 

This situation proves my point. If we need to push up people to use the public transports, we need first to improve its quality.
In the lastLastly [or "Finally"], we have more and more of solutions available to solve the pollution problem without putting any creating restrictingve laws to that make the people to not unable to have his their own car.

[Great job!]

(1/2)

In the first place, we can agree to differ [do you mean "defer"?] that the idea which pushes up to restrict the people not to have anything. This is not reasonable. Why? Because I believe that everyone have the all rights to have everything without own anything as long as it does not hurting others. [This paragraph is a bit confusing]

So, how can we solve this problem? In my viewpoint [or "opinion"], the government can reduce the pollution with by restricting laws for driving in the crowded areas. Furthermore, that will decrease the pollution in these areas.

Moreover, we can reduce the pollution with by creating roads, tunnels and bridges. And tThis will also make the traffic easy and faster. At the same time, the government can increase the public transport. They can improve the quantity, quality and diversity of buses, undergrounds and river transports.

The government can put pass laws to reduce the numbers of old cars, because it’s they emitted more and more of the carbon dioxide. Also, they can watch the rates of the carbon dioxide. The government can watch the quantity of the carbon dioxide in from each car. W when they check the test a car for giving it a license.