N'y a-t-il personne là-bas? Alors je n'irai nulle part.
For translating "Is there no one there? Then I won't go anywhere", I thought on:

- N'y a-t-il personne là-bas? Alors je n'irai nulle part.
- N'y a-t-il personne là-bas? Alors je n'irai en aucun endroit.

Which one is better? Or maybe both aren't good?
Thank you!

Question

N'y a-t-il personne là-bas? Alors je n'irai nulle part.
For translating "Is there no one there? Then I won't go anywhere", I thought on:

- N'y a-t-il personne là-bas? Alors je n'irai nulle part.
- N'y a-t-il personne là-bas? Alors je n'irai en aucun endroit.

Which one is better? Or maybe both aren't good? 
Thank you!

Answer

I agree with Roger on saying the first one is the correct one.
However, using the negative form looks totally fine (and much better) to me. It is used in the Larousse entry for 'nulle part' for example : http://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/nulle_part/55240

Answer

Hello, the first one is the correct translation. Although  you should not use the negative form. "Alors j'irai nulle part".

Evden çıkmadan dil öğrenme fırsatını kaçırmayın. Deneyimli dil eğitmenlerimizden oluşan seçkimize göz atın ve ilk dersinize şimdi kaydolun!