Çeşitli İngilizce öğretmenleri arasından arama yapın...
chin.billy.leung
국물도 없다 i came across this expression but still not entirely sure the right situation to use it. naver defines it as follows: 아무것도 돌아오는 몫이나 이득이 없다는 것을 비유적으로 이르는 말 here is one example that i encounter in a book but i think the translation is a bit off as compared to the definition from naver: 또 한번 내 동생 골탕 먹이면 내가 가만히 안 있을 거야. 국물도 없을 줄 알어. If you play that prank on my brother again, you will hear from me. And you can be sure that you’ll be dead meat. The second part seems more like a threat to the other party. However, i am not quite sure by employing this expression really achieves an effect as such, per definition from naver. I need more examples on the circumstances where this expression can be used appropriately.
19 May 2018 14:45
Yanıtlar · 2
XXXX 하면, 국물도 없을 줄 알아 First, the purpose of this sentence is emphasizing that another person should not do it. It's like a warning message. Second, the meaning is from the metaphor - In Korea, often we eat Korean style meal which is served with 밥, 국, and 반찬. For 국, it consists of something that we can chew(eg. vegetables or meats) and a liquid(국물). So the meaning is if I say I won't give you even 국물, which means I won't give you the least/trivial part of the meal. So, it's like a warning saying, "If you do the similar thing again, I won't give you any benefits that I used to give you" Third, I want to note that this expression is not that widely used except for a particular scenario. It depends on people, but I don't use this expression at all.
19 Mayıs 2018
Hâlâ cevap bulamadın mı?
Sorularını yaz ve ana dil konuşanlar sana yardım etsin!

Evden çıkmadan dil öğrenme fırsatını kaçırmayın. Deneyimli dil eğitmenlerimizden oluşan seçkimize göz atın ve ilk dersinize şimdi kaydolun!