Çeşitli İngilizce öğretmenleri arasından arama yapın...
Andrés
Is "would" more than an auxiliare verb?
Look at this sentence:
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we would otherwise"
Why "would" doesn't need here of any complementary verb? Can "would" work alone?
Can I change "would" for "could" on this example?
23 Tem 2019 15:32
Yanıtlar · 4
Thank you Chris, your advice always is really good
23 Temmuz 2019
Would takes a verb object. Here "we would " is an elliptical version of "we would spend."
The statement is an implicit type 2 conditional. (rephrase) "Sunscreen emboldens us to spend more time in the sun than we WOULD SPEND otherwise (= if we didn't use/have sunscreen).
Here, the modal could can replace would with no significant change in meaning. Like would, could takes a verb object. (rephrase) "Sunscreen emboldens us to spend more time in the sun than we COULD SPEND otherwise (= if we didn't use/have sunscreen).
23 Temmuz 2019
Thank you Kyler Shea, very good answer, it's clear!
23 Temmuz 2019
"Would" is a verb. It doesn't need a complimentary verb. It works alone. You can change "would" for "could" but the meaning is a little different. Also, switching "otherwise" and "would" sounds more natural. You can say:
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we otherwise would"
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we otherwise could"
Both are good sentences
23 Temmuz 2019
Hâlâ cevap bulamadın mı?
Sorularını yaz ve ana dil konuşanlar sana yardım etsin!
Andrés
Dil Becerileri
İngilizce, Fransızca, Portekizce, İspanyolca
Öğrenim Dili
İngilizce, Fransızca, Portekizce
Beğenebileceğin Makaleler

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
17 beğeni · 13 Yorumlar

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
15 beğeni · 12 Yorumlar

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
12 beğeni · 6 Yorumlar
Daha fazla makale
