Çeşitli İngilizce öğretmenleri arasından arama yapın...
AmirrezaTopluluk Eğitmeni
A very basic question that I should not ask but I ask anyway :) Why we say "To be verbs" when it is actually "an infinitive". I think if it was a verb, then it mustn't have forms such as (am, is, are). This must actually be an infinitive with the base verb "be" and other forms based on different tenses. I mean we should say "be" verb instead of "to be" verbs. Also, if "to be" was a verb, it's meaning should be similar based on each subject. Take the example of "to walk". We say it's an infinitive with "walk" as a base verb. And the meaning of "walk" is intact based on the subjects. But, for "to be" it seems it is reverse.

Yanıtlar · 4

0
I don't understand the question.
0
because you never use "to must", "to can", "to should" etc.
0
It is still a verb, it's just that this one is irregular, which happens to many verbs in English.
0
This is an interesting question. I had not thought about this before. "To be" does change forms more than other verbs. "am / is / are" compared to "walk / walks" or "eat / eats." I don't know why, but it is interesting to think about. Good luck!

Hâlâ cevap bulamadın mı?

Sorularını yaz ve ana dil konuşanlar sana yardım etsin!

Evden çıkmadan dil öğrenme fırsatını kaçırmayın. Deneyimli dil eğitmenlerimizden oluşan seçkimize göz atın ve ilk dersinize şimdi kaydolun!

Bugün öğrenmeye başlayın