the field and the city I am fascinated by aerial views, from there it is possible to understand the contrast between two ways of occupying space, that of the human being: with reason, planning, strict mathematics and geometry (the straight lines of the routes and the alignment of the cultivated fields show that). On the other hand, nature without sequence, nor logic, nor intention, rivers that meander the plains and forests that grow to the destination of who knows where the seeds fall. Being the space only one, there is necessarily the competition, man deforests to create his civilization and nature sows its seeds to break what is built. This is how the “Field and the City” series emerges in an abstract way, resorting to the duality of geometric and free forms, as well as the planned and spontaneous techniques. Cities have straight lines, rectangles, triangles, and squares while nature has organic curves. In the technique: the rational intervention are planned brushstrokes or stencil rulers, while the spontaneous one is a thin acrylic on the canvas allowing to apear unpredictable shapes.