Can anybody tell me what this phrase means please? Vaccines are desperately needed in the developing world. Even when they’re available and inexpensive, there’s still a major problem: most vaccines need to be refrigerated. Reaching the relevant populations often means traveling to areas where electricity and refrigeration [are spotty at best]. be spotty at best, what does this mean? Thank you

What is the difference between novel and fiction? What is the difference between novel and fiction? can anybody explain it for me please, thank you :)

Is there anybody can teach me a traditional homemade Australian dish? I'd like to try traditional Australian homemade food, anyone knows anything about it? lol

Is this sentence right and does it make sense? The reasons for the rural residents moving to the cities might be the cities offer more working opportunities with higher salary and provide better condition of education and healthy care than the rural areas do.

what does this expression mean? In order to stem the tide of...

How do you distinguish "varied and various" and "different and distinct"? How do you distinguish "varied and various" and "different and distinct"?

Less languages makes life easier or not? (No offensive, just an essay) Languages are the most important and effective tools for the human communication. However, the existed language numbers keep decreasing. Some claims that it is not an important issue while life becomes more convenient without too many languages. From my perspective, I agree with this opinion. First of all, the variety of languages impedes the communication between people from different culture. Translation is no longer a prior solution for solving the communication problems and it is not efficient. Using distinct languages is extremely difficult for information exchanges and doing business under this contemporary age. Moreover, too many languages play as an impeder for people who intend to find certain useful materials and references. The modern knowledge and techniques are mainly recorded by using the widely spread languages, such as English. For one thing, this is for searching convenience of some specific materials; for another, the contents recorded by the mainly used languages are much more various than any other small languages which probably can not provide the exact details. Further more, multi-languages may cause some serious social problems, not only in the traditional countries but also in the countries with multi-culture. People who speak differently may be isolated and alienated by others who speak same language. Consequently discrimination possibly raises conflicts which is detrimental for the union and peace of a country. By way of conclusion, I reaffirm that this world would be benefited by using less languages. It not only contributes to the world development and integration, but also to the global harmony and stability. Even though more languages stand for culture diversity, it is a fact that more people gradually abandon less used language under the trend of globalisation.

Should museums be free for admission or not? Museum is a place to exhibit things or events which are significant and memorable. Nowadays people become decreasingly willing to visit museums hence some museums tend to be free for public. Free admission brings advantages indeed but the disadvantages are obvious as well. Free admission for museums brings one significant advantage: it considerably raises the visitors number which is museum's original intension. Generally museum is a place where people would not review. However the museum visitors are mainly non-local and most of them would not visit a museum unless a museums displays novelty and other interesting exhibits. Free admission would attract more non-local people to make them remember where they visit. Moreover, it is also an available method to bring local review, especially for young people since museums are educational venues that convey culture, spirit and knowledge. However, the negative effects of free admission can not be overlook either. First of all, it becomes harder to financially support a free museum because museum is not only the place to display but also for conservation. Protections and maintenance are important for exhibits for long-term preservation whereas free tickets would leave fund blank that might lead the exhibits lives to be shortened. Moreover, visitor's growth means more possibility of exhibits suffering damages. It gives an administration and security burden for supervisors. In addition, free admission might not a sound way to establish a public awareness of respecting exhibits. Over all, I believe that the disadvantages brought from free admission for museums overweighs the advantages. Tickets with reasonable price are necessary income for overheads which is important to support protection and administration so that museums are able to preserve exhibit as long as possible to show more generations.

Furthermore and Moreover What is the difference between Furthermore and Moreover? Are they used for linking two sentences saying one thing or two things having same meanings or two things having converse meanings.