Which answer would you choose? David was___by his family because he worked hand in glove with a gang of criminals to rub the commercial bank of jewelry A. deserted B. abandoned C. refuted D. repelled

could you tell me the obvious difference between "abandon" and "desert" when they are both verbs?

help! A heated debate has arisen recently concerning to whether we should take part-time jobs during school days. Some proponents believe that taking part-time jobs can not only earn the money, but gain skills and experiences needed in future. However, the opposing view insists that the priority of a student is his academic studying, and meanwhile part-time jobs’ disadvantages outweigh its advantages in general. From my perspective, I am in favor of the proponents’ idea. Firstly, there is no doubt that we cannot concentrate on two things at the same time. In our daily lives, we may be easily distracted by other entertainments while studying. So this is true to the relation between study and work. Secondly, It is not worthy of giving up our academic careers due to it. As the results we can predict that Taking part-time jobs may lead to some disruptive consequences, such as absenting from lessons, losing interests to study, even worse, losing the degree diploma. Most importantly, the core of study is to learn how to learn, this is a world that attaches great importance to efficiency, and meanwhile benefits learning can bring are intangible and lifelong, which we can learn from it to shape our personalities that is significant to our future success. In conclusion, I strongly hold the view that we should not take part-time jobs during school days, as learning can certainly guide us to experience a new world, and we would definitely be grateful for it in the future.

this is 笔芯~ this is what we call 笔芯~~

Help! A lively debate has ensued recently concerning whether changes are beneficial for us or not. Those who are in favour of it believe that it's necessary to adapt ourselves to it, while the opposing view argues that frequent changes would block our ways to get promotion in work or make progress in study. From my perspective, I would support the idea of proponents. Firstly, we need to acknowledge that sometimes changes are inevitable. life is like a box of chocolate, and you never know you are going to get. However, we have to react to it so as to secure our futures. Secondly, as one of the younger generation, we may don't know what is actually suitable for us. When personal interests meet reality, how we choose from it？I think, only after a couple of tryings, can we handle it better. Most importantly, to change doesn't mean to lose ourselves, on the contrary, It's to keep ourselves that we change. As long as we have a sense of border and limit, we can be ourselves. In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that changes are benefit for us. There is no doubt that we grow into mature persons, If we are adaptable to changes.

help！ A lively debate has ensued recently concerning whether changes are beneficial for us or not. Those who are in favour of it believe that it's necessary to adapt ourselves to it, while the opposing view argues that frequent changes would block our ways to get promotion in work or make progress in study. From my perspective, I would support the idea of proponents. Firstly, we need to acknowledge that sometimes changes are inevitable. life is like a box of chocolate, and you never know you are going to get. However, we have to react to it so as to secure our futures. Secondly, as one of the younger generation, we may don't know what is actually suitable for us. When personal interests meet reality, how we choose from it？I think, only after a couple of tryings, can we handle it better. Most importantly, to change doesn't mean to lose ourselves, on the contrary, It's to keep ourselves that we change. As long as we have a sense of border and limit, we can be ourselves. In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that changes are benefit for us. There is no doubt that we grow into mature persons, If we are adaptable to changes.

Please ... help...! At present, with the economics developing rapidly worldwide and the globalization deepening in every aspect of our lives, people are likely to get more opportunities to get in touch with the other countries than ever before. Thus, it must raise an issue that whether people send their children to study overseas. Some who are in favor of it believe that studying aboard is of benefit. Firstly, it can not only let us make more friends, but broaden our horizons. Also, We have to acknowledge that experience far outweighs others in modern society. Secondly, we’re easier to spread our culture and values, which consolidate the foundation of integration of regions and countries. Most importantly, we can develop good personalities significant to our future. However, There are indeed existing some disadvantages with it. For instance, children may feel upset or homesick, if it is their first time to go aboard alone, besides, they are subjected to something bad without parents’ supervision. Even worse is that they may pace a way for crimes. Summing up, though there are both advantages and disadvantages on this issue, on a personal front, I still strongly suggest that we are necessary to go out, no matter for what reasons, if possible.

Help!! In recent years, a heated discussion has arisen as to whether we should live in a first tier city or not. Some proponents voice their opinion that they believe they can not only enjoy the higher services and programs, but have more choices in their occupations, meanwhile, they remained easily available to prestigious education there. While other opponents state that many second or third cities are developing rapidly, which has changed dramatically. As far as I’m concerned, I would certainly choose to live in a first tier city. Firstly, as one of the young generation, I prefer to struggle for my ideal life, at the same time, there is no doubt that It’s more convenient for us in every aspect-food, housing, clothing, transportation and so forth. Secondly, living in a big city means more possibilities, that is to say, we don’t have to confine ourselves to only one field. Besides, I consider that the personality are key to future success.,However, which depends on the surroundings. Mostly, importantly, I want to provide my children with more opportunities to accept better education, because It’s vital for their future and lives. In conclusion, I’m strongly in favor of the perspective that we live in a first tier city. No matter what difficulties we need to confront with,I never give up for a better and deserved life.

View On Whether We Shoul Use Animals For Experiments In recent years, There is a heated discussion that whether human should use animals for scientific experiments. Some who are supportive of it state that in this way, people can reduce the losses and failures and acquire the data needed. However, Others consider that It’s cruel to treat animals, which may generate some inaccurate and misleading information. From my perspective, I have a intense identification with using animals for experimentation purposes. Firstly, We have to acknowledge the fact that we are inadequate with bodies used for experiments, because still few people are willing to donate their bodies for science and technology after death. Furthemore, I believe that our science and technology developing so rapid bode well for the accuracy of experiments so that we can make every effort to attribute to the society. Besides, Animals are more available for us to get, which can not only save substantial expense and ease the woes. Last but not least, This program marks the great progress in the long path of human evolution. In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that we human being should use animals for experimentation purposes,by which we can create a more colorful and harmonious world together benefiting more and more people.