Çeşitli İngilizce öğretmenleri arasından arama yapın...
Gönderiler
IELTS Writing Test 2 Topic: Some people say job satisfaction is more important than job security, while others believe that having a permanent job is better than enjoying the job. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Everyone has to work. The question is: which one is more important from job security and job satisfaction. Some people think job security is more important, and the others think the opposite. In my opinion, both of them are important. Everybody needs job security. If we can have a job which we will never lose it, we will make a lot of money. Then we can buy big houses and expensive cars. We can have a perfect marriage. Also if we have this kind of job, we will not worry about losing our jobs. It’s easier to be joyful and relaxing. We do not have to take time to find jobs. In the meantime, we can have more time to get together with our family and friends. However, it is also important to have job satisfaction. If we have an interesting job, we can do our job better. We can have a strong sense of achievement from our job and even achieve success. If we are not interested our job, no matter how stable our job is, we can never succeed. Take one of my friend Jack for instance, he is a common employee in a big Internet company. He is not really interested in his job. As a result, he just wants to play video games after work. In conclusion, I think it is the best to have both of job security and job satisfaction. Because this kind of job helps us have a wonderful life. I wish we could all have such kind of job.
13 Kasım 2017
2
0
IELTS Writing Test 3 Topic: Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play until they are six or seven years old. Others believe that it is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible. What do you think are the advantages of attending school from a young age? In the past, children go to school when they are about six or seven years old. However, it is more likely now parents both work, so they do not have enough time to take care their children. Instead, children can only go to school when are much younger. Some people think it is not beneficial for children. Especially the traditional points, they are afraid that children will not close to their parents, or children will lose their wonderful childhood. In my view, there are actually many advantages. First of all, it is now more and more expensive to bring up children. If parents have to quit their jobs because of the baby caring problem. They may cost a lot of money more than they pay for the nursery school. In the modern society, if there is only one person who is working in a family. That may result in some imbalance in financial area because man makes all the money. Another advantage of going to school earlier is it can bring some benefit for children. At daytime, children can develop their skills, boost their brain development and increase their independence at school. And after school, children still can get together with their parents. And children can share the school things with them. Parents also can get a plenty of information from school teachers. In conclusion, there are enough advantages to send children to nursery school at young age. I believe that is good for most children. Though it is a little bit challenge for children, it will pay off in future.
12 Kasım 2017
2
0
Should universities accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject? Topic: Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. There are plenty of subjects in university today and the problem of gender imbalance is more and more severe in some of these subjects. Some people think universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. But I feel it is not a good idea, it may lead to some bad results. Firstly, some students could possibly go to the wrong subject which is not suited for them. If they can not get fun and achievement from their subjects, even they could waste their whole university days. For universities, the rule may lead to many subjects can not enroll enough students, such as art major, literature major or language major. It is a waste of resource and is not beneficial for the economy. In the meaning time, the employers of universities need to take a great of time to handle applications of changing majors. On the other hand, the rule also could bring some good influence. If a study group which is combined with male students and female students built some achievements, it would give them a sense of achievement. Students can also find their lovers easier. Especially mechanical engineering major or computer science major. After all, most female students do not like these subjects. In conclusion, the half and half rule could bring some benefit in a limited area, but it will lead to more bad results. I think universities should guide students to choose the subjects that they really fond of and help students increase study satisfaction.
11 Kasım 2017
0
1