Amirreza
مدرّس
Considering the two adjectives "fat and short". Why we say :He is short and fat but not He is fat and short. Or, He is tall and thin but not He is thin and tall. Although they both are from the same category of adjective "Size", they can't be used interchangeably. At least I haven't seen the other way around. Please clarify me !
٢ فبراير ٢٠٢٢ ٢١:١١
الإجابات · 6
3
You're right, we always hear these pairs of adjectives in those orders, but there's nothing grammatically wrong with switching the orders; it's just what has become customary. "Why do we say ... " "Please clarify this for me."
٢ فبراير ٢٠٢٢
1
Actually, there are rules to the order of adjectives in English (though most English speakers don't learn them anymore, and so they are unaware of them). Here is the order, from first (left) to last (right): Determiner (e.g., a, an, the, these...) Quantity or number (e.g., three, many, some...) Quality or opinion (e.g., ugly, rude, pleasant...) Size (e.g., little, enormous, tall, short, microscopic...) Age (e.g., ancient, old, new, young, modern...) Shape (e.g., fat, round, baggy, bent...) Color (e.g., red, blue, dark, bright...) Proper adjective (e.g., Russian, Italian, American...) Purpose or qualifier (e.g., sports, pet, water...) (NOUN) This is why we say "tall and thin" or "short and fat": because size comes before shape.
٣ فبراير ٢٠٢٢
1
There is nothing wrong with saying those phrases either way. The way you’ve always heard , “short and fat” is simply habit. The meaning is the same when you say “fat and short”.
٣ فبراير ٢٠٢٢
لم تجد إجاباتك بعد؟
اكتب اسألتك ودع الناطقين الأصليين باللغات يساعدونك!