Creo que mejor utilizar auxiliary verbo "do" si es ingles de estados unidos - "Do you have any news?" o si es ingles de inglaterra es mejor decir "Have you got any news?"

The way you said it is mostly used in British English -- in American English, "have" (tener) uses "do" just like any other normal verb. On the other hand, when "have" means "haber," then it does not use "do," because in that case "have" is the auxiliary. Also, I agree with Jeff -- just say "have you heard from your father?" ("heard" equivale a "supiste algo.")

The way you said it is mostly used in British English -- in American English, "have" (tener) uses "do" just like any other normal verb. On the other hand, when "have" means "haber," then it does not use "do," because in that case "have" is the auxiliary. Also, I agree with Jeff -- just say "have you heard from your father?" ("heard" equivale a "supiste algo.")

The way you said it is mostly used in British English -- in American English, "have" (tener) uses "do" just like any other normal verb. On the other hand, when "have" means "haber," then it does not use "do," because in that case "have" is the auxiliary. Also, I agree with Jeff -- just say "have you heard from your father?" ("heard" equivale a "supiste algo.")

The way you said it is mostly used in British English -- in American English, "have" (tener) uses "do" just like any other normal verb. On the other hand, when "have" means "haber," then it does not use "do," because in that case "have" is the auxiliary. Also, I agree with Jeff -- just say "have you heard from your father?" ("heard" equivale a "supiste algo.")