اعثر على معلِّمي الإنجليزية
Danyel
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе...
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
&
Thе cakе would havе been burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
What is the difference?
٢٩ أبريل ٢٠١٧ ٠٩:٣٥
الإجابات · 2
1
As Micahel helpfully explains, "the cake would have burnt" is referring to the action of the cake burning, whereas "the cake would have been burnt" refers to the final result - a burnt cake!
---
Want to learn English the SMART (Stretch, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely) way with me? Go to my teacher profile and book your $1 trial lesson now!
http://bit.ly/paulblakemanitalkiteacher
٢٩ أبريل ٢٠١٧
1
to be burnt - burnt is a past participle which is being used as an adjective to describe the state of the cake.
to burn - verb to describe the activity in this case within itself (the cake); there is no direct object
There is no significant difference in meaning in this case.
٢٩ أبريل ٢٠١٧
لم تجد إجاباتك بعد؟
اكتب اسألتك ودع الناطقين الأصليين باللغات يساعدونك!
Danyel
المهارات اللغوية
البيلاروسية, الإنجليزية, الفرنسية, البولندية, الروسية, الأوكرانية
لغة التعلّم
الإنجليزية, البولندية
مقالات قد تعجبك أيضًا

Speak More Fluently with This Simple Technique
14 تأييدات · 2 التعليقات

How to Read and Understand a Business Contract in English
16 تأييدات · 3 التعليقات

6 Ways italki Can Help You Succeed in Your School Language Classes
12 تأييدات · 7 التعليقات
مقالات أكثر