ابحث بين معلمي الإنجليزية المتعددين...
Emory
[ Grammar ] Participial Clause 1 S1 : John met Mary [ walking down the street. ] ( no comma before walking ) S2 : John met Mary [ ,walking down the street. ] ( comma before walking ) S3 : Walking down the street, John met Mary ( comma before John ) 
 ————————————- Q1: Are there any differences of meaning between S1, S2 , S3 ?
 —> S1 = S2 = S3 or S1 =/= S2 = S3 or ….
 Q2: In S1, can we regard Participial Clause “ walking down the street ” as the complement ?

 Q2-1: From Q2, this complement is the Subject Complement to modify John 
 —> John met Mary while walking down the street. or the Object Complement to modify Mary —> John met Mary ( who was ) walking down the street. or Both are possible ? Q3: Which one was walking ? John or Mary ? in each S1, S2 , S3 ------------------- It's so confusing! Thanks a lot : )
١٦ يونيو ٢٠١٩ ١٣:٤٦
الإجابات · 2
1
Practical English Usage by Michael Swan has a good, brief explanation of participles. S1: John met Mary [ walking down the street. ] ( no comma before walking ) = John met Mary who was walking down the street. S2: John met Mary [ ,walking down the street. ] ( comma before walking ) = John met Mary while John was walking down the street. This is normally considered an error (misrelated participles). S3: Walking down the street, John met Mary ( comma before John ) = While John was walking down the street, John met Mary. This is the preferred form of S2. Q1: S1 and S3 have different meanings. S2 is a bad version of S3. Q2: In S1, "walking down the street" is a participial clause which functions as an adjective modifying Mary. In S3, "Walking down the street" is a participial clause which functions as an adverb modifying "met." Q3: In S1, Mary was walking. In S2 and S3, John was walking.
١٦ يونيو ٢٠١٩
لم تجد إجاباتك بعد؟
اكتب اسألتك ودع الناطقين الأصليين باللغات يساعدونك!

لا تفوّت فرصة تعلّم لغة جديدة وأنت مرتاح في منزلك. تصفّح مجموعتنا المختارة من مدرّسي اللغات ذوي الخبرة وسجّل في درسك الأول الآن!