ابحث بين معلمي الإنجليزية المتعددين...
Andrés
Is "would" more than an auxiliare verb?
Look at this sentence:
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we would otherwise"
Why "would" doesn't need here of any complementary verb? Can "would" work alone?
Can I change "would" for "could" on this example?
٢٣ يوليو ٢٠١٩ ١٥:٣٢
الإجابات · 4
Thank you Chris, your advice always is really good
٢٣ يوليو ٢٠١٩
Would takes a verb object. Here "we would " is an elliptical version of "we would spend."
The statement is an implicit type 2 conditional. (rephrase) "Sunscreen emboldens us to spend more time in the sun than we WOULD SPEND otherwise (= if we didn't use/have sunscreen).
Here, the modal could can replace would with no significant change in meaning. Like would, could takes a verb object. (rephrase) "Sunscreen emboldens us to spend more time in the sun than we COULD SPEND otherwise (= if we didn't use/have sunscreen).
٢٣ يوليو ٢٠١٩
Thank you Kyler Shea, very good answer, it's clear!
٢٣ يوليو ٢٠١٩
"Would" is a verb. It doesn't need a complimentary verb. It works alone. You can change "would" for "could" but the meaning is a little different. Also, switching "otherwise" and "would" sounds more natural. You can say:
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we otherwise would"
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we otherwise could"
Both are good sentences
٢٣ يوليو ٢٠١٩
لم تجد إجاباتك بعد؟
اكتب اسألتك ودع الناطقين الأصليين باللغات يساعدونك!
Andrés
المهارات اللغوية
الإنجليزية, الفرنسية, البرتغالية, الإسبانية
لغة التعلّم
الإنجليزية, الفرنسية, البرتغالية
مقالات قد تعجبك أيضًا

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
17 تأييدات · 13 التعليقات

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
15 تأييدات · 12 التعليقات

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
12 تأييدات · 6 التعليقات
مقالات أكثر
