ابحث بين معلمي الإنجليزية المتعددين...
المنشورات
Essay 3
Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer.
--------------------------------
Being a school teacher has never been an easy job because he/she has to face a group of unruly students who are in their rebellious phase. But is it a good idea to separate them in a dedicated classroom to teach? I do not favor this point of view.
Separated education may have some positive effects on the class discipline temporarily. However, it is not a final solution to the problem. Even worse, it may cause more serious issues. To begin with, it is unfair for the disruptive students to be grouped together in a dedicated classroom because this may cause negative impacts on them psychologically, making them feel they are ignored and treated differently from their peers in a normal classroom. And I believe this runs contrary to the idea of equal education. Moreover, grouping the disobedient youngsters all together may make the classroom discipline even worse and difficult to manage. This is primarily because children tend to imitate each other, especially for misbehavior.
As a result, I suggest that some better alternatives can be adopted to tackle the problem. For example, those who try to make noises in the classroom are basically intending to attract other’s attention. To address this, the teacher can offer an opportunity for him/her to give a performance or lecture on an interesting topic in front of the whole classmates. Another advice is that the teachers need to make their tutoring more stimulating and attractive, which can attract all students to focus on the course and enhance the teaching effectiveness considerably.
To conclude, I would argue that separated education would never be a key to a better classroom. Instead, to solve the problem of unruly students, some sorts of psychological strategies should be used.
--------------------------------
Word count: 290
0
0
Essay 2
Although abuse of the system is inevitable, social welfare payments are essential to protect the rights citizens to have a guaranteed minimum income in a democratic society. Why？What is your opinion?
==========================
It is not uncommon that in many countries, relief payments are paid by the government to the needy families and people, even though excessive use of the system may exist. I believe it is a necessary measure in terms of preserving basic rights of the citizens due to the reasons below.
In the first place, providing welfare aid to the individuals who are in need help maintain the stability and harmony of the society. As the gap between the haves and have-nots are increasingly broadened, some impoverished individuals may have to break the law to get the money for their living. To prevent this, some aids should be provided by the government to support their living to they will not end up committing crimes.
Another reason is that welfare payment is a reflection of humanitarianism, which protects the basic rights of human beings. As a result, government should shoulder the obligation to take care of the disabled families, single mothers and new immigrants who have not been employed.
In my opinion, besides the necessity of relief payment, the government also needs to ensure the effectiveness of this measure. For one thing, the funds should be paid to the people who are really in need, which can be achieved by investigating the background of the claimed persons. Secondly, without merely restrained to financial support, other kinds of aids can also be provided, such as re-education and vocational training courses, which equips the skills to the people to find a job.
To sum up, I tend to argue that social welfare as well as other forms of aid is indispensable for every country, but certain regulations should be adopted to ensure the fairness and effectiveness of the measure.
==========================
Word count: 286
0
0
An English essay about crime
[TOPIC]Some people think all lawbreakers should be taken in to prison, others believe that there are better alternatives. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
#########################
This is my answer in response to a recent English academic writing exam. Some points may be too simple, anyway, just focus on the language.
#########################
[ANSWER]
Some individuals believe that all criminals need to be put into jail, others, however, argue that better choices can be used. I tend to agree with the latter with some supplements.
For thousands of years, prison has played a pivotal role in human history as a tool of punishment. To a large extend, prison has frightened and curb crime rates by depriving lawbreakers’ freedom.
However, prison has its own shortcomings as a way of legal penalty. Firstly, running a poison that accommodates thousands of inmates spends a considerable amount of government budget, which could have been used for other pressing issues in the society, like education and medical care. Furthermore, imprisonment is not always an effective way for criminal reform. Especially for some repeat offenders, prison is far from the destination in their crime lives.
Therefore, I suggest that some other alternatives could also be adopted by the government. For example, according to some statistics, a large percentage of lawbreakers committed crimes fundamentally due to lack of proper education in their young ages. As a result, by attending educational and training courses provided, offenders can learn more about the consequences of breaking law or be qualified to find jobs that can support their living. Another way is to oraganise some inmates to involve in community activities and charity jobs, which can help them realize the pleasure of socializing and helping others. I believe both are useful methods to help offenders become good citizens.
To sum up, I would argue that prison is not the only way for criminal reformation. To achieve a better result, it should be combined with other educational approaches.
Word count: 272
15
1
