I had not sent him the file when he had asked I thought he felt resentful because I had not sent him the file when he had asked but had sent him later while he did not want it anymore. Is the tense of the above correct? The sequence of the action is: He asked for the file -> I did not sent him -> he stopped ask him -> I sent him the file.

I felt both pampered and suffocated/ stifled in being in love with him. 1. Now I know what's wrong with our relationships. I felt both pampered and suffocated/ stifled in being in love with him. Should I use suffocated or stifled? or both work? 2. I like the way my friend Helen and her boyfriend love each other. They trust each other, care about each other, and think each other is "the one." Is there other word to replace "each other?" I feel I'm using it too much? 3.I think this is how a healthy love should be, feeling happy from the heart for your partner's dream fulfilled, rather than feeling threatened by it. Should I use "dream fulfilled" or "dream to fulfill"?

this morning I woke up naturally, almost ten o'clock, pretty luxurious this morning I woke up naturally, almost ten o'clock, pretty luxurious I want to say that I didn't set an alarm clock, I wake up til I have enough sleep. 1. Is "naturally" here clear enough? 2. I use "luxurious" here to describe this was a rare experience/ opportunity. (like buying something very expansive..). Is it weird to use this word?I chose the wrong category of this question, I chose " learning Mandarine." Don't know how to fix it...

When I check my message, the file is already lying there. When I check my messege, the file is already lying there. When I check my email box, the mail is already lying there. Do they sound natural? I want to describe that the message or file sent by messege or email that I'm looking for is there when I check it.

Practice day 1- 2018/8/14 journal Today I decided to practice English writing everyday and my goal this year is to improve my writing vastly. I remembered that I have been troubled for my unproficient English writing ability since I was in college. At that time, I was overwhelmed with the heavy course load. English writing was one of the challenges I encoutered and wanted to overcome, since nearly all the courses I took required me to answered my exams in English. But at then I was too busy with other challenge - reading, all forms of literary texts required by my major were super hard for me, some of them even written in ancient English. Because I was too busy struggling with the readings and also because I thought my writing would automatically improve as I read a lot, I didn't do any deliberate practice. But I found that my writing didn't improve as much as I expected. One reason might be I didn't write enough, so there are many words and sentence structures that I understand when I am reading, but I cannot think of them while writing, so I cannot appropriately express what I mean to say with various words and sentence structures. The other reason might be that what I read could not help me so much in writing, because they were too hard for me so I focused on comprehend the texts rather than paying attention to their word use, not to mention that some of them were ancient English that I will never use it in my writing. Therefore, I decided to do "deliberate practice" on my writing everyday. Hope someone could give me advice on whatever the grammar, word use or sentences structure so that one day I can master English writing and write like a native speaker.

even so, of /about /on, towards/ for 1. Is the word "even so" here correct? I want to say even the above sentence is correct: Third, the firm recommends its client to invest in Consolidated Industries under the assumption that oil will still be the major fuel for heating for many years, which we cannot be sure. Even so, it is too risky to invest in a company solely because its major business operations is the retail sale of home heating oil, other aspects of the company should be examined before investing, for example, its revenue, cost, management efficiency…etc, to consider whether the company is worth investing or not. 2. Should I use " of/ about/ on " in the following sentence? he did not provide detail information of/ about/ on? how this data was collected. 3. Should I use" towards or for" in the following sentence? the two factories might have different standards towards/ for on-the-job accidents.

Choosing which field to study - part 2 Some may claim that educational institutions have the responsibilities to tell their students which field they should not study because educational institutions have the experiences that their students do not have. They might already have students who have studied in a field and they found it takes a lot of efforts to do well in that field and very few people could make it. Therefore, their experiences could be very helpful for those students interested in this field to consider more and save their time. However, I think the educational institutions should not “dissuade” their students just because other people find it difficult to achieve in that field. Instead, educational institutions could provide the information needed for their students to make the decisions. For example, educational institutions could hold speeches and invite people from different fields to share their experiences, including how much effort they make to succeed, or even why they gave up in a field and turned to other fields. Once the students have sufficient information, they could decide whether they have the talents and determination to do well in the field that other people do not recommend. To sum up, the educational institutions should not dissuade their students from what they choose to study, but provide the information and support to help their students make the decision they satisfied with.

Choosing which field to study - part 1 While many people believe that educational institutions should give their student advise on which field to study to have more possibility to succeed, I think educational institutions should not dissuade students from studying in a field but could provide objective situations of the fields of study their students want to pursue. First, educational institutions cannot understand their students better than the students themselves. Thus, it is difficult for educational institutions to know their student would “succeed” in the field of study or not. To be good at a specific field, students need not only the intelligence or abilities to learn the knowledge or skills, but also need other qualities like passion and perseverance of that specific field. For example, if a student wants to be a counsellor, he needs to understand psychology, how human minds and brains work and the communicative skills needed to understand his clients. However, if he does not have the passion to talk to people and listen what his clients want to express, it if very difficult for him to be a good counselor. Also, if he could not persevere in what he does, he might give up too early once obstacles show up. Therefore, In addition, educational institutions cannot be responsible for the future of their students, so they should not dissuade their students from studying what they like, but studying in the field that are “more likely to succeed” but the students have no passion at all. It is the students who are going to spend their time studying in the fields they choose and maybe spend the rest of their lives working in that field. If they do not like what they choose, they could not enjoy their lives because normally two-third of the time would be spent at work.

need help for correction of the sentence Could anyone helps me to correct the sentences? ..... I think this is a great skill but "needed" time to practice and "integrate"in real life. Q1: Should I write "needed" time or "needs" time? Q2: For the word integrate i think was wrong. What I want to say is "to use the skill naturally in daily life."