ابحث بين معلمي الإنجليزية المتعددين...
المنشورات
Hello guys.. im from Azerbaijan, and Muslim. However, in my country this holiday is celebrated, but not as a Christmas holiday, as New Year) very few people know it is originally a Christsmas holiday)
0
1
Please guys check this essay also..
The pie chart compares the proportion of calories with 3 various diets.
Overall, it is clear that carbohydrates record by far the highest percentages in the consumption of the diet. By contrast, it is interesting to note that fat contains the lowest figures for keeping a diet for sport in the provided pie chart.
Looking at the pie chart in more detail, carbohydrates in a healthy diet for sport shares a large proportion at 60% which is significantly higher, compared to an average diet at 40%, as well as 10% more than for healthy diet, make up just 50%. Moreover, fat accounts for a fifth which is equal at for both average diet and a healthy diet. However, it is 5% less than for a healthy diet for sport.
It could be explained by the fact that protein is the most popular with 40% in an average diet and it represents 30% and 25% for a healthy diet and healthy diet for sport, respectively.
0
0
Please guys check my essay, and how many scores can be given to this essay?
The given mixed graphs present information about the proportion of deprived females as well as how many
men and women in different age groups were in the poverty line in the USA in the year of 2008.
Overall, it is no surprise that single women without children recorded by the far highest figure, while married women who had no children contained the lowest share in the pie chart. It is also interesting to note that needy women outnumbered the level of poor men in all age groups over the year given.
Looking at the pie chart in more detail, females who were single with no dependent children shared the largest proportion at 54% which was 2 times higher than that of single women with dependent children. However, the poverty line was much better in married women who had children and without kids, accounting for 12% and 8% respectively.
It could be explained by the fact that the rate of impoverished men and women in their younger ages were much higher than 15%. It can be clearly seen that the ratio for men who were poor decreased with the increase of age and reached about 6%, whereas this figure for females increased in the age group 75 and older, made up nearly 13% at the end of the period. (23 minutes – 218 words
7
0
Please guys check my essay.. thanks
Many children who are home-schooled are not prepared for the university at the same rate as children in government-funded schools. What do you think are the causes of this? What effects will this have on society?
It is true that the vast majority of school children receiving education at home lag behind those who are studying in schools supported by the government in terms of entrance ration to the university in today's complex society. This essay aims to discuss the root causes and then describe the possible effects of the issue.
There are several crucial reasons for this trend. One primary cause of this issue is that schooling at home would probably bring about children to be not as motivated as the same at schools. This is because the atmosphere at school is totally oriented to the lessons as opposed to classes at home which children are definitely in a cosy ambience. Another contributing factor could be thought that children lack interaction with one another while being educated at home. In other words, children at school sometimes help one another in different subjects or vice versa, there may be a cut-throat competition between them. In any case, both of these cases are likely to be beneficial for them in order to prepare for university.
The possible impacts of this problem on society should not be neglected. First and foremost, it can be argued that distance-learning might definitely be undervalued by people. Of course, it is a more flexible way of studying, however, more school boys and girls may be likely to fall behind with their studies compared to face-to-face classes. The second underlying outcome could be considered that the demand for the public or state schools will increase considerably by society. Although there are some pricey boarding schools, the government has provided public schools with financial aid, which allow people to obtain an education. For example, in my country, there were plenty of Turkish boarding schools which were inexpensive before, then the fees skyrocketed and the demand for these schools was replaced by state schools.
In conclusion, it is understandable that home-educated might be useful for some people, however, government-aided public schools seem utterly essential for society
0
1
Please guys, help me) thanks in advance
It is an irrefutable fact that the vast majority of people tend to change their careers in today's complex society. This trend can be attributed to a host of factors and I would argue that it is considered being a negative outlook.
There is no doubt true that several reasons could be a driven force for people to shift their careers. First and foremost, it could be argued that having very heavy workloads could possibly bring about a shift in a career. That is to say, nowadays people are forced to work under pressure in order to meet deadlines. Another key sticking point is that a salary earned from a job would probably be not enough to meet peoples' need. As a result of this, most people could end up commencing to look for new workplaces.
These developments can be considered to be a negative view. It is certainly inevitable people will have a tendency to change their occupations under the aforementioned circumstances. Nevertheless, in my opinion, if we consider this issue broadly, this trend would bring more drawbacks to individuals, business entities, as well as society. In other words, the job market nowadays is becoming more and more competitive, hence people who are willing to change their professions do not have deep knowledge of another job. In addition to this, in the future, they may have hardship in climbing the career ladder in a professional way. For example, if people working in the field of sale want to change their occupation to accounting, it will take them several years to be professional.
In conclusion, it is understandable that people ought to shift their workplace under inappropriate conditions, however, in my view, this aspect in terms of being professional in any field should not be neglected.
0
0
Hello everyone, please check my essay)
The increase in the production of consumer goods causes damage to the natural environment, what are the reasons and what can we do to solve this problem?
It is true that growing consumer commodities' production takes a devastating toll on the natural environment in today's complex society. Although there will undoubtedly be some prime reasons for this trend, societies can take steps to mitigate these potential causes.
As the usage of consumer products climbs progressively, several related reasons can be anticipated. It can be argued that rising manufacture of the consumer welfare could possibly give rise to people exploit raw materials excessively. In other words, related companies make use of these materials in order to meet the increasing demand of people. Thus, governments, as well as organisations, try their best to reach remote places due to their untouched resources. It might be therefore considered that this approach should definitely do the damage to nature.
There are several actions that the government could take to solve the problem mentioned above. Initially, the government should encourage people to cultivate plants in their fields as much as possible. It is no doubt true that this may be a problem for the urban population, however, the government can tackle this hurdle by improving vertical gardens along with apartment buildings. In addition to this, large companies and organisations should absolutely make contracts in order not to touch far off destinations in the world being filled with resources. To give an example for this, the antarctic conventions among countries can be shown.
In conclusion, various measures can be taken to solve the problems that are certain to arise if the world countries take into account increasing consumer products.
35 minutes - 255 words
0
0
hi everyone, could you please check my essay, to be honest, i didnt approve my essay)
Some people think that the amount of noise people make should be controlled strictly, while others say that people are free to make as much noise as they wish. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The discussion about whether human beings ought to be observed seriously because of their noise, or they can benefit from the freedom at making as much noise as they want in today's complex society raises a thorny question. Although there are several arguments in favour of people who tend to make a noise as they desire, I strongly believe that making use of the freedom in order to make a noise in the public should be deliberated after considering many factors.
There is no doubt true that it is totally in the hands of people to make noise wherever they are. It can be argued that people have their freedom to do whatever they want due to human rights. That is to say, people are enabled to behave as they wish in the frame of human rights. In addition to this, it also depends on where people are or wherever they go. For example, in the clubs, shopping malls, in the street we may have a chat or laugh at our jokes.
Despite the aforementioned arguments, I tend to believe that people should be controlled outside due to their behaviour such as making noise. Primely, it could be asserted that making noise would probably break other people's rights. In other words, these kinds of behaviours are faced up wrongly by other people in the public. It means we may worry people around us, for instance in the street, shop, public places, by making noise or speaking, laughing loudly. Therefore, it can be agreed that people need to be managed because of this anxiety by the police force whose obligation is to maintain public tranquillity.
To conclude, despite some people claiming that being free means people can do whatever they want, I am inclined to believe that human beings should be responsible for their treatment such as making noise.
2
0
Could you please check my essay)
Some people think that providing many TV channels is a great thing, but others think that this may affect the quality of TV programs. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The discussion about whether seeking the benefit of the manifold TV channels should be understood as a significant tool, or it might have an effect on the quality of TV programmes in today's complex society raises a thorny question. It can be argued that TV viewers ought to derive benefit from myriad TV channels. And I do not believe that it has some detrimental sides for the quality of TV programmes.
On the one hand, multiple TV channels are considered to be a positive thing by people. That is to say, it enables TV viewers to choose several options among other channels. In other words, if you are keen on certain kind of topic, you may have a chance to choose a channel which is deal with it. For example, Discovery Channel, History Channel, National Geography Channel are qualified by different topics.
However, today there are countless TV channels which show only advertisements for different products over and again on a daily basis. It can be therefore agreed that these kinds of channel should be closed down because of lack of usefulness.
On the other hand, I tend to believe that it can not wreak havoc on TV programs. This is because the quality of TV programs does not dependent heavily on plenty of TV channels, rather than it is regarding the preparation of instructive programs, informative shows. From this point of view, the TV industry might absolutely limit its spectators to only important programs. As a result of this, restricted TV channels would eliminate the redundant, as well as unethical shows and present only effective, also high-quality shows to their TV subscribers. For instance, it has been shown from our channels that recently CBC channel removed some rather violent scenes and words in cartoons so that children would not be encouraged to try it to others.
In conclusion, despite some people claiming that many TV channels might influence the quality of TV programs, I am inclined to believe that the number of varied TV channels with useful programs should be increased.
0
0
Please guys, check my essay.. thanks
Some people think that it is beneficial to travel abroad, but others think it is unnecessary because we have the internet and TV. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The discussion about whether or not deriving benefit from travelling to foreign countries should be understood as a significant phenomenon in today's complex society raises a thorny question. Although there are several arguments in favour of people who underestimate travelling abroad due to the presence of the internet and TV, I completely believe that people should focus on visiting different countries.
There are several reasons why it is utterly incorrect for people to go abroad in terms of the internet and TV. First and foremost, it could be argued that surfing the internet and watching TV could possibly bring about access to the globe. That is to say, the internet along with TV is enough for people to get plenty of information about places in the world. For example, there are wide ranges of TV programs which enable people to get to know various countries. These resources are quite sufficient to learn anything about the different areas in the world. However, it can be agreed that seeing a place on the Tv is not the same as going to places of interests.
Despite the above arguments, I tend to believe that people ought to seek benefit from making a journey. The initial point would be that a tour would probably cause people to get to know varied places in more depth. In other words, taking a journey may definitely assist to determine distinct cultures of that spot, learn something about their customs, as well as fauna and flora. There is a saying that, the more you visit, the more you can learn. Today it is possible to travel every corner of the globe by diverse transportation means. Planes are prime examples, people can get cheap charter flights to go far off destinations of the world.
In conclusion, despite some people substantiate that the internet and TV have positive sides in terms of learning useful information about multiple places, I am inclined to consider that the pros of travelling outnumber the cons.
4
0
Please guys, check my essay for Ielts task 2..thanks beforehand
Some people think that it is beneficial to travel abroad, but others think it is unnecessary because we have the internet and TV. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The discussion about whether or not deriving benefit from travelling to foreign countries should be understood as a significant phenomenon in today's complex society raises a thorny question. Although there are several arguments in favour of people who underestimate travelling abroad due to the presence of the internet and TV, I completely believe that people should focus on visiting different countries.
There are several reasons why it is utterly incorrect for people to go abroad in terms of the internet and TV. First and foremost, it could be argued that surfing the internet and watching TV could possibly bring about access to the globe. That is to say, the internet along with TV is enough for people to get plenty of information about places in the world. For example, there are wide ranges of TV programs which enable people to get to know various countries. These resources are quite sufficient to learn anything about the different areas in the world. However, it can be agreed that seeing a place on the Tv is not the same as going to places of interests.
Despite the above arguments, I tend to believe that people ought to seek benefit from making a journey. The initial point would be that a tour would probably cause people to get to know varied places in more depth. In other words, taking a journey may definitely assist to determine distinct cultures of that spot, learn something about their customs, as well as fauna and flora. There is a saying that, the more you visit, the more you can learn. Today it is possible to travel every corner of the globe by diverse transportation means. Planes are prime examples, people can get cheap charter flights to go far off destinations of the world.
In conclusion, despite some people substantiate that the internet and TV have positive sides in terms of learning useful information about multiple places, I am inclined to consider that the pros of travelling outnumber the cons.
43 minutes - 331 words
0
0
أظهِر المزيد
