Encuentra profesores de Inglés
maple cookie
Hello! Today I wrote about should animal testing be maintained. I think that animal testing should be maintained because it brings substantial benefits to humans, especially in the field of medical research. First it has led to the invitation of new drugs such as penicillin and insulin, and the development of medical treatment such as organ transplant. If medical research is not possible, humans will be killed by new virus such as Covid-19. Therefore using animal in experiments contribute to the field of medical research, and it made our life more comfortable. Moreover if human use in experiments and die, the company would commit murder, also I have a concern that how to decide a person who participates in experiments it is very dangerous, so I think it will be elected a person in a socially weak position. Now some group argue that protect animals right but it isn't protect these person if using humans in experiments. Second animal testing is more effective and less as humans and can be good indicators of negative reactions in humans. Computer simulations are often costly and even the most sophisticated ones cannot replicate the complicated interactions that take place in the human body. Therefore I think that animal testing should be maintained. Thank you for watching my essey!
13 de nov. de 2023 4:12
Correcciones · 1
Hello! Today, I wrote about whether animal testing should be maintained. I believe that animal testing should be continued because it provides significant benefits to humans, particularly in the realm of medical research. Firstly, it has resulted in the discovery of new drugs like penicillin and insulin, as well as advancements in medical treatments such as organ transplants. Without the possibility of medical research, humans could be vulnerable to new viruses like Covid-19, making the use of animals in experiments crucial for progress in the field of medical research and ultimately enhancing our quality of life. Additionally, if humans were used in experiments and faced fatal consequences, it would be considered a grave ethical issue, akin to committing murder. Furthermore, determining who should participate in such experiments poses serious risks, and I believe individuals in socially vulnerable positions should be elected for such purposes. While some groups advocate for animal rights, it's essential to recognize that using humans in experiments does not necessarily protect these rights. Secondly, animal testing is more effective and less risky than using humans, serving as valuable indicators of potential negative reactions in human subjects. Computer simulations, although advanced, are often costly and unable to replicate the intricate interactions within the human body. Thus, I contend that maintaining animal testing is essential for scientific progress. Thank you for reading my essay!
13 de noviembre de 2023
¿Quieres avanzar más rápido?
¡Únete a esta comunidad de aprendizaje y prueba ejercicios gratuitos!