Busca entre varios profesores de Inglés...
GotoBrazil
Why to use "read" rather than "readS"?
“Mao must be portrayed as great and glorious. He must not be besmirched,” read one popular comment.
11 de jul. de 2021 15:57
Respuestas · 9
2
It is using “read” as the past tense of read. It seems that the comment was already posted so the author used the past tense.
you can say,
“Mao must be portrayed as great and glorious. He must not be besmirched,” reads one popular comment.
which means the same thing but in the present.
.
11 de julio de 2021
2
It sounds like this is in the passive voice. Read (pronounced “reed”) becomes read (pronounced “red”) in the passive voice. Hope that helps!
11 de julio de 2021
1
This is a good question.
Asad''s example is correct.
The problem is that we spell the word "read" the same, even when we pronounce it differently.
You could say it in 2 ways:
Reads = (pronounced like reeeeeeeeeeeeeeds" )puts it in the present.
Read = ( pronounced like "red") puts it in the past.
Either one makes sense.
Our spelling system can be confusing sometimes.
11 de julio de 2021
1
It's similar to reported speech, so you're telling me about something someone else said, so it is in the past tense.
ReadS is a present tense form.
11 de julio de 2021
你好,有唔有興趣一齊學習英文?我想搵個夥伴齊齊學習
13 de julio de 2021
¿No has encontrado las respuestas?
¡Escribe tus preguntas y deja que los hablantes nativos te ayuden!
GotoBrazil
Competencias lingüísticas
Chino (mandarín), Inglés
Idioma de aprendizaje
Inglés
Artículos que podrían gustarte

How to Ask for a Raise or Promotion in English
9 votos positivos · 8 Comentarios

The Key to Learning a Language Faster
31 votos positivos · 8 Comentarios

Why "General English" is Failing Your Career (An Engineer’s Perspective)
30 votos positivos · 12 Comentarios
Más artículos
