Is it necessary to add the second "of the " in this sentence? I am wondering if it still remains same meaning after omitting it.
He is one of the foremost "of the" founding fathers.
"He is one of the foremost founding fathers" The second "of the" would be awkward and unnecessary.
28 de enero de 2023
1
1
0
It looks fine to me with or without "of the". "Of the" is not necessary.
27 de enero de 2023
1
0
0
Yes, this way is fine. However in this latest sentence you have omitted “founding”, which changes the meaning.
27 de enero de 2023
1
0
0
Yes. As it is currently written “of the” is necessary.
However if the final word is changed from plural to singular, “of the” must be omitted:
“He is the foremost founding father.”
27 de enero de 2023
1
0
¿No has encontrado las respuestas?
¡Escribe tus preguntas y deja que los hablantes nativos te ayuden!