Busca entre varios profesores de Inglés...
[Eliminado]
Why is the indicative mood rather than subjuctive mood? (detailed topic inside)
Why did the conditional clause use subjunctive mood, while the main clause used indicative mood (i.e. past simple) rather than subjuctive mood (e.g. would do or be)?
-
If it were gentle, only the more unstable rods fell. If it were severe, they all fell.
3 de oct. de 2016 4:02
Respuestas · 6
1
I'm not sure there's much to explain here except that the writer made a mistake. The correct sentence would use your alternative:
If it were gentle, only the more unstable rods would fall. If it were severe, they would all fall.
Another possibility would be a mixed conditional, which mixes a present condition with a hypothetical past result:
If it were gentle, only the more unstable rods would have fallen. If it were severe, they would all have fallen
(actually, I'm not even sure what this sentence even means...I'm assuming “it" refers to wind, that's the only "it" word I can think of that collocates with "gentle" and “severe”.)
3 de octubre de 2016
¿No has encontrado las respuestas?
¡Escribe tus preguntas y deja que los hablantes nativos te ayuden!
Artículos que podrían gustarte

Santa, St. Nicholas, or Father Christmas? How Christmas Varies Across English-Speaking Countries
5 votos positivos · 4 Comentarios

Reflecting on Your Progress: Year-End Language Journal Prompts
3 votos positivos · 2 Comentarios

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
25 votos positivos · 18 Comentarios
Más artículos
