Encuentra profesores de Inglés
Danyel
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе...
Thе cakе would havе burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
&
Thе cakе would havе been burnt іf І hadn't gonе to thе kіtchеn.
What is the difference?
29 de abr. de 2017 9:35
Respuestas · 2
1
As Micahel helpfully explains, "the cake would have burnt" is referring to the action of the cake burning, whereas "the cake would have been burnt" refers to the final result - a burnt cake!
---
Want to learn English the SMART (Stretch, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely) way with me? Go to my teacher profile and book your $1 trial lesson now!
http://bit.ly/paulblakemanitalkiteacher
29 de abril de 2017
1
to be burnt - burnt is a past participle which is being used as an adjective to describe the state of the cake.
to burn - verb to describe the activity in this case within itself (the cake); there is no direct object
There is no significant difference in meaning in this case.
29 de abril de 2017
¿No has encontrado las respuestas?
¡Escribe tus preguntas y deja que los hablantes nativos te ayuden!
Danyel
Competencias lingüísticas
Bielorruso, Inglés, Francés, Polaco, Ruso, Ucraniano
Idioma de aprendizaje
Inglés, Polaco
Artículos que podrían gustarte

Speak More Fluently with This Simple Technique
14 votos positivos · 2 Comentarios

How to Read and Understand a Business Contract in English
16 votos positivos · 3 Comentarios

6 Ways italki Can Help You Succeed in Your School Language Classes
12 votos positivos · 7 Comentarios
Más artículos