Busca entre varios profesores de Inglés...
[Eliminado]
Supposed to VS Suppose to
Sorry again for this stupid grammar question... I don't wanna look up on internet today, I'm too lazy... ٩(๑`^´๑)۶
Are these two sentences grammatically correct?
What am I suppose to tell you?
What was I supposed to tell you?
Please give me some examplezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzz
25 de oct. de 2018 11:14
Respuestas · 7
3
Hi Snoop,
'What am I suppose to tell you?' is incorrect
The second is correct.
Examples:
What do you suppose Linus did when Snoopy washed his blanket?
Snoopy: 'Linus' blanket was so dirty, what else was I supposed to do - use it on my sofa?
Hope this helps :-)
Martin
25 de octubre de 2018
1
'suppose to' doesn't exist
both sentences should be 'supposed to' - the tense is not important
:)
25 de octubre de 2018
1
The expression "supposed to", if you want to describe what someone should do, is always spelled "supposed to" and not "suppose to". It always goes with a form of the verb "to be" ("He was supposed to do ...............", or "She's not supposed to do ........").
25 de octubre de 2018
¿No has encontrado las respuestas?
¡Escribe tus preguntas y deja que los hablantes nativos te ayuden!
Artículos que podrían gustarte

Santa, St. Nicholas, or Father Christmas? How Christmas Varies Across English-Speaking Countries
3 votos positivos · 0 Comentarios

Reflecting on Your Progress: Year-End Language Journal Prompts
2 votos positivos · 1 Comentarios

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
25 votos positivos · 17 Comentarios
Más artículos
