Busca entre varios profesores de Inglés...
Andrés
Is "would" more than an auxiliare verb?
Look at this sentence:
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we would otherwise"
Why "would" doesn't need here of any complementary verb? Can "would" work alone?
Can I change "would" for "could" on this example?
23 de jul. de 2019 15:32
Respuestas · 4
Thank you Chris, your advice always is really good
23 de julio de 2019
Would takes a verb object. Here "we would " is an elliptical version of "we would spend."
The statement is an implicit type 2 conditional. (rephrase) "Sunscreen emboldens us to spend more time in the sun than we WOULD SPEND otherwise (= if we didn't use/have sunscreen).
Here, the modal could can replace would with no significant change in meaning. Like would, could takes a verb object. (rephrase) "Sunscreen emboldens us to spend more time in the sun than we COULD SPEND otherwise (= if we didn't use/have sunscreen).
23 de julio de 2019
Thank you Kyler Shea, very good answer, it's clear!
23 de julio de 2019
"Would" is a verb. It doesn't need a complimentary verb. It works alone. You can change "would" for "could" but the meaning is a little different. Also, switching "otherwise" and "would" sounds more natural. You can say:
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we otherwise would"
"Sunscreen emboldens us to spend longer in the Sun than we otherwise could"
Both are good sentences
23 de julio de 2019
¿No has encontrado las respuestas?
¡Escribe tus preguntas y deja que los hablantes nativos te ayuden!
Andrés
Competencias lingüísticas
Inglés, Francés, Portugués, Español
Idioma de aprendizaje
Inglés, Francés, Portugués
Artículos que podrían gustarte

Same Word, Different Meaning: American, British, and South African English
17 votos positivos · 13 Comentarios

How to Sound Confident in English (Even When You’re Nervous)
15 votos positivos · 12 Comentarios

Marketing Vocabulary and Phrases for Business English Learners
12 votos positivos · 6 Comentarios
Más artículos
