Hi everyone! I have to take exam soon. please check writting for me. Thank you all of you Essay 1: Genes that respond to touch. firstly, calmodium is a protein involved in calcium signling within the cell. secondly, the mechanism of gene respond to touch is that: the beginning is depolarzation of the membrane, then aspike of calcium concentration, increase in amount of calmudium protein and the last step is activation of other protein. We will focus on detail, when people touch, Canxi concentration become higher the binding of calmodium and Ca2+, after that action reaches the end of a nerve cell across membrane of propagation of neibouring cell. Inaddition, root plant reachs stone induce 2% of gene are activated (similar impact of people, wind, animal touch), it will respond to tactile sensation to other to survice with the change of envirnment. also, that experiment make suprise because of how far we touch, and with a large number gene. There are four situation occur when we touch. they are fast reaction(light trap), slow reaction (morphogenesis: rood navigation), electric sign and gene expression. In conclusion, I illutrated about mechanism of gene respond to touch. It is very interesting about plant. I hope that all of you will get more knowledge from that.

Is this sentence right? Áo dài which is long dress is tradition costume of Vietnam.

What is the difference between two sentences? please help me! 'We got in through the window which someone had left open' and 'We got in through the window which someone had left open'.

please check it for me. Thank you so much :) smoking There is ongoing debate as to whether smoking should be banned in whole public places brings more benefits or drawbacks to the our modern society. To a certain extent, I agree that, this is overall a negative development. However, I also think that every coin has two sides, and smoking in all publics is not an exception. The primary advantage of smoking in all public places is, of course, smoking has been proven to be very dangerous for health. As one cigarette contains more than 4000 chemical substances, therefore, it causes for many dangerous diseases such as heart attacks, asthma, bronchitis or lung cancer. According to a recent report in Britain close to 3,500 people are killed each year in road accidents and 120,000 are killed by smoking.. Also, it is obvious that smoking is not only a health hazard for the smoker, it creates more harm to the people around them. This is especially harmful for those with weaker immuse systems such as children and elderly. Those who hold the counter-argument seem to believe that passive smokers make the choice to breathe in other people’s smoke by going to places where it is allowed If they would prefer not to smoke passively, they do not need to visit places where smoking is permitted. Other people may also complain that it is a matter of freedom of choice. Smoking is not against law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke where they wish. To conclude, after weighing the pros and cons of the issue, I firmly think that smoking in all public should be reduced in order that it would create less negative effects to our environment as well as our health.

writing Ielts task 1 :) please check it for me. thanks alot! The table illustrates data on consumer spending on a series of items in five countries, namely, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Turkey in 2002. It can be seen that Food, drinks, Tobacco were the most important position on consumer spending in these countries. In Ireland and Turkey, they were around 30 %, while in the other 3 countries, they got under 20%. Clothing and Footwear were the second important consumer spending in five countries. In Italy, the figure reached 9.00 %, and in Sweden, they were 5.4 %. In the other 3 countries, the figure were approximate 6.5 %. The last consumer expenses were Leisure and Education. In turkey, they were 5.4%. In the other four countries, the statistics were very similar, they were nearly 4%. In conclusion, in 2002, food, drinks and tobacco were the most important consumer spending in the five countries, and different countries’ consumer were quite different .

Please help me. I will take Ielts in August 16. I need your help. Thank you so much :) Nowadays, the matter whether the sale and production of genetically modified food are growing has long been the focus of discussion. Different people have different perspectives on the issue and mostly depend on their own position on the question. To people who agree with the point that saling and producing of genetically modified foods are encouraged, this means producing organic food is not sufficient to meet the demands of rising number of people. This assertion certainly sounds reasonable because population increase sharply while farm areas are decreasing. Another reason for this viewpoint lies in the fact that according to research number of people 2 times rose whilst the farm area dropped 2 times compared to beginning of 20th century. Furthermore most of farms became industrial zone and farmers preferred to work in companies to have better opportunities. Currently even if organic foods were produced in farms all over the world, products can not answer this huge demand. production of genetically modified products is an effective way. But the counter-argument is that new generation of food with modification can cause new diseases and scientists are not aware of effects of them in lives. In addition, we are witness that many people are concerned about their diet but they are not aware of the type of food that they usually use it and also some companies do not allow customers to know about the process of their products. By the way in conclusion, many benefits but still much debate on this. So I suggest that the need for more adequate research on the applications of genetically modified foods.

Please help me. I will take Ielts in August 16. I need your help. Thank you so much :) Topic: the negative of globalization. Nowadays, the spread of globalization has been the focus of of the the heated debate. Among all the related problems that people are highly concerned with, globalization is an extremely acute one. Whether we can solve this problem properly is of vital importance to the diversity of national cultures around the world. There are several reasons why people argue that globalization brings much more disadvantages to the general development of human than advantages. I believe that the effects on the gap between rich and poor regions is the main cause. The fact that there are more and more companies and corporations from developed countries spend much money to invest in other poorer ones to hire cheap workers and exploit precious minerals and resources helps to answer why the differences in living standards between countries is obvious. Countries with modern technologies and new scientific inventions are becoming richer, and others, specially in South East Asia and almost the whole of Africa, are going to be poorer and poorer. Another factor causing this unfortunate situation is the extinguishment and disappearance of national cultures. The variety of native cultures contributes much great worth to the general improvement of human beings. In this case, because of the violent spread of foreign cultures with the helps from modern technologies such as internet, people in poor countries prefer new things and forget every valuable thing that their ancestor left for them. More importantly, globalization is also the cause for the increase of social evils. We ignore that in some European and American nations, youngsters can easily find and use hot weapon like gun, or in some Arabian ones, people can create and use bombs everywhere. We also forget that globalization not only brings achievements but also serious problems, including environmental pollution and global warming. As for solution to this worrying situation, I believe that we should firstly focus on culture preservation. Besides, government needs to sustainable integration strategy, economic development. However, they must be assessed and appropriate solution for environmental and social issues that will also be helpful. With mutual effort and collective will, such measures could really contribute to the sustainable development of eonomy and society. Certainly nobody wants to see the economy has gone into steep decline as well as more and more a corrupt society nowadays.

Is it correct? 'Being passionate about what I do, I will be successful'. thank you so much :)

Is it correct? 'Must be passionate about the success' or 'must be passionate for work will be successful' please help me. Thank you so much!