IELTS 9 Writing Task 2：Improve public health Q：Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. A： In recent years, the notion of health has gradually become important. The issue of improving public health is also discussed by people. The question is whether increasing the number of sports facilities could achieve this goal or other methods should be considered. There is no doubt in my mind, doing daily exercise is good for health. If governments construct more facilities to promulgate doing exercise, it will be more convenient for citizens. For instance, a community sport centre might be built and gymnasiums, parks and swimming pools also located nearby their houses. They will not have excuses to be lazy to go exercising. Moreover, they could save the time in taking transport. However, doing exercise is not the only way to improve and keep one's fitness. Some people still get sick although they do a lot of sports. The reason is they have a bad living custom, such as staying up late or eating fast food. Doing exercise will not make them better. There are more elderly and sick people living in the world. The medical improvement, therefore, is significant as well. Another reason is that people are so busy in modern society. They are multitasking and they always forget the importance of their health. Governments should hold some activities to remind them and encourage them to do exercising at the free time. In my opinion, increasing the number of sports facilities is necessary but not the best way to improve public health. To be healthy involves healthy diets, normal life, sufficient sleep and daily exercise. As a result, I think governments should consider all kinds of methodologies in order to construct a better living environment. (Thanks for helping me ^_^)

IELTS writing task 2 Q：Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree？ A： In the present education system, voluntary service is not a compulsory part of high school programmes but still some people think that it should be added into one of them. Life is not short but also not so long. People cannot live without interaction and communication. In this process, we learn how to help others and receive aids. As a result, appropriate opportunities offered for students to learn these thing are significant. Students could pick up lessons from helping others and improve their mind of empathy. They will understand why disabilities learn slowly and pay more patience to help them. They will also broaden their horizons by teaching children. Teaching is learning. For instance, they might realize their community service, they recognize distinct living situations and conditions and be more satisfied with their lives. Although this voluntary course compress the time students could spend on studying and may cause some side effects, such as students are reluctant to help others, it still a meaningful activity to them. In the future, they can have a more mature manner to face other people who need helps. They will be more sensitive when they encounter problems. In my opinion, I definitely think that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. There are tens of thousands of problems occurring in the world. If people can become more enthusiastic and welcoming, our lives will be better. Helping others is not only providing aids but also receiving rewards. We will acquire more medical knowledge by working for a charity in hospital. We will establish a more intense connection with neighbours by helping marshal garbage. There are so many benefits through the voluntary.