IELTS writing task 2. About crime

It is a recurrent topic that if the criminal spent more time in prison there would be less felonies. However, many lawyers and judges think that there are other resources methods to decrease the number of crimes.

It is agreed by many that if potential criminals are afraid of being punished with a long time in jail, they will think it twice befer conmit before committing crime. Moreover, there are certain crimes, like serial killing or child molestation that deserve a severe punishment. However, the countries with harder sentences, don´t have less crime rates, for instance, the US have has life sentences, but it doesn´t reduce crime rates with regard compared to Europe.

In order to reduce the amount of citizens that break the law, there are ther three strategies. Many think that the better best place to start is at school, teaching how to behave behaviour in society. In spite of all the preemptive actions, some will not follow the law and willl have to be punished. But However instead using longer prison sentences, it would be of more benefit to show them alternatives wayas of making a living, for example teaching them a new job.

In conclusion, there are many felonies that deserve to spend a time in prison. In spite of this, justice shouldn´t center in longer sentences, but in convincing the criminals not to break the law, or once they do, convince them not to do it again. In order to accomplish this there are many ways, like educational programs in school or adding them new skills when they are inmprisoned. Finally I can´t agree with the statement that harder punishment means more security.

IELTS writing task 2. About crime

It is a recurrent topic that if the criminals spent more time in prison there would be less felonies. However, many lawers and judges think that there are other resources ways to decrease the number of crimes.  (or you could say "reduce the crime rate"

It is agreed by many that if potential criminals are afraid of being punished with a long time in jail long jail sentences, they will think it twice before commiting a  crime. Moreover, there are certain crimes, like serial killing or child molestation that deserve a merit severe punishment. However,  the countries with harder sentences don´t have less crime rates lower crime rates. For instance, the U.S. has life sentences but it doesn´t reduce their crime rates with regard  compared to Europe.

In order to reduce the amount of citizens that break the law there are ther strategies. ( Different strategies may be used in order to reduce the crime rate)  Many think that the better best place to start is at school, teaching how to behave in society. In spite of all the preemptive actions, some will not follow the law and willl have to be punished. But instead using longer prison sentences, it would be of more benefit to show them alternatives ways of making a living, for example teaching them a new job (skills to obtain a new job).

In conclusion, there are many felonies that deserve  should lead to spend a time spent in prison . In spite of this, justice shouldn´t center on longer sentences but rather in convincing the criminals not to break the law, or once they do, convince them not to do it again. In order to accomplish this there are many ways, like educational programs in school or adding teaching them new skills when they are inmprisoned. Finally I can´t agree with the statement that harder punishment means more security