ming
"He insisted on reading the letter." Had he started to read? "He insisted on reading the letter." Had he started to read? Or it is ambiguous . How should I express the meanings as "he insisted on getting start to read." and as "he insisted on continuing reading."
2016年1月29日 08:53
回答 · 4
4
It is ambiguous. It doesn't say if he had started reading. The meaning would depend on the context, and in most cases it would then be clear. It doesn't necessarily make sense to try to interpret it out of context. "he insisted on getting start to read." is not grammatically correct. I assume you mean "He insisted on starting to read the letter". Or maybe "He insisted on opening and reading the letter". If he had started, you could say "He insisted on continuing reading the letter". More natural would be "He insisted on reading the rest of the letter" or "... the whole of the letter".
2016年1月29日
1
First of all, you should provide a context with this kind of question. He insisted on reading the letter - does not say whether he has eventually started to read the letter or not. It only says the he expressed his desire to do it. "he insisted on getting start to read.", "he insisted on continuing reading." - did not get your question here. Those sentences mean: He wants to begin with reading, he wants to continue reading. Do you want some other ways to say it?
2016年1月29日
まだあなたの答えが見つかりませんか?
質問を書き留めて、ネイティブスピーカーに手伝ってもらいましょう!
ming
語学スキル
アラビア語, 中国語 (普通話), 英語, フランス語, ドイツ語, 日本語, 韓国語, スペイン語
言語学習
アラビア語, フランス語, ドイツ語, 日本語, 韓国語, スペイン語