check my essay please!^^ I think people should not accept unfairness because they can change their circumstance by requiring justness to society and persuading that there is no need to bear such thing other people. the historical example,the civil rights movement, support my position that people can get fairness by fighting. in spite of the founding principle that all men born equal, separate but equal was a legal doctrine which allowed legal racial discrimination during mid-20th century. under this doctrine, black citizens were forced out of the facilities and treated badly but the majority of them accepted the circumstance without questions and often resorted to their subservient roles in society. however in1955, rosa parks ,a black woman, were asked to move from the first row of the black section to allow a white man to sit but she refused and demand her right as a passenger and defend it as a human being. she spoke out that the american society was full of the hypocrisy and lies because the us cover itself as a democratic country and epitome of freedom but it discriminate its citizens by their skin color. her courageous act prompted the Montgomary bus boycott,an crucial part of the civil rights movement. she fought for freedom. the concept of the separate but equal went against the fundamental moral values which were supposed to guide the United State of America. while no one make known the appropriateness of reform rosa parks saw that the majority was going on the wrong path and so demanded her right. because she attempted to reform the circumstance the civil rights movement gained significant momentum , leading to the decree of the separate but equal as unconstitutional and the freedom and equality of 20th century. this example shows that nothing will change without an attempt to reform it. By fighting for justness, people can enjoy fair and just society. Another example, a dystopian novel 1984 supports my point. the protagonist winston fight to gain his own his autonomy continually contrasting with those who are too docile to concern over their total lack of freedom. he is increasingly worried about the party's monopoly on truth and its manipulation of the historical records. he plans to overthrow the government to save the masses from hypocrisy and lies the party has been shamelessly handling. however his righteous attempt fails because of the public who blind by the love for their government and antagonizes winston.

please check my essay ! I think people don't need to keep things private because people can have many benefits by sharing their ideas and thoughts. People can impact others in a good way and they can change their circumstance by sharing their opinion with others. The civil rights movement supporst my opinion that by sharing idea people can change a circumstance.History proves that one prompted a change by exchanging her or his idea. In spite of the founding principle of the US that all men born equal, ''separate but equal'' was a legal doctrine during mid 20th century in the constitution of the US. Black citizens were forced out of the facilities and treated unjustly but they did not object to their status as second class citizens and often resorted to their subservient role in society without questions. When they treated unjustly they keeps things private as this way was safer and easier. However, in1955, rosa parks,a black woman,was asked to move from the first row of the ''black section' but she refused to do so, defending her own right as a human being and pronouncing that she treated unfairly as a passenger. Her courageous act prompted montogomary bus boycott which lasted 381days. Finally, the warren court decreed that the segregation of bus should be ended. If she had kept the unfair treatment private this boycott would not have had succeeded. Because she has done so, this movement gained momentum, later leading to the decree of the principle separate but equal as unconstitutional and the freedom and equality of 20th century. this example shows that sharing one's view is not only desirable but also respectful to bring a change. Another example, dystopian novel, 1984 which set in a nation watched over by a omnipresent and omniscient government with tele screens which monitor everyone's daily life. supports my point of view that sharing one's opinion about society helps one dream a better society and act courageously because he or she has a supporter who sympathize his or her ideas. This novel contrast those who never talk about their total lack of freedom with ,the protagonist, winston who defies the authority to gain his own autonomy. He first starts a rebellious action by doing trifle things such as writing a journal .but after he met Julia and falls in love he become more confident in his behavior. He joined a rebellious a club named Brotherhood, planing to overthrow the government systematically. before he lose julia the sole partner who shared his idea he never stop

i have a question about english grammar!! brazil is not only the most populous of the twelve country but also the largest in area why 'in area' has to be corrected?