多彩な 英語 講師陣から検索…
投稿
Which country would you like to visit for two weeks?
To begin with, I enjoy travelling very much. I have been to several countries in Europe. But if I had the opportunity to go wherever I want, I would choose a journey to New Zealand. I have at least two reasons for that choice.
The first reason is the miraculous wild nature of this country. New Zealand is situated on two islands, but despite this fact, it has a variety of landscapes, such as mountains and plains, rivers and lakes. People there care about the nature indeed, that is why they have kept it pristine. Within those two weeks I would try every kind of outdoors activity: hiking, cycling, rock climbing, sailing. Not in every country, you can do it on a such small territory. Moreover, I was told that no big predators inhabited there. To my mind, it’s a crucial advantage for the tourists who prefer travelling safely. I’m certainly that type of person.
My second reason may seem a little odd because it is connected with my another hobby – J.R.R.Tolkien’s oeuvre. As far as I know, Peter Jackson shot “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy in New Zealand. I was truly fascinated with landscapes shown in those films. Surely, I would like to see all the scenery I could find there. It’s like to step into that magic world for a while. Who will refuse to meet elves or dwarves if one has a chance?
In conclusion, I would like to add that visiting New Zealand is one of my dreams, as you may see from this essay. Unfortunately, I doubt I can ever go there because of enormous duration of the flight. I can hardly endure trip to Egypt which lasts for 4 hours, so 14 hours will be definitely unbearable. Nevertheless, I keep hoping that one day my dream comes true.
1
1
Recommendation to open a café in Monarch Books store
The Board of Directors believe(s) that opening a café will increase the number of customers, thereby Monarch Books will be able to compete better with its rival – Regal Books. However, this argument relies on a series of unproven assumptions that should be checked before implementing such a decision.
First of all, every market has its maximum capacity that is determined by the number of potential customers and their ability to pay. There is no clear evidence that Monarch books can attract significant amount of people who were not their customers before. For example, the area the bookstore is situated in may be not much populated. Attracting people with too low income is another possible consequence. Thus, the first question for examining is: how many new clients can Monarch books get and how much will revenue from them be if opening a café is truly successful?
Secondly, the Board of Directors should remember about business efficiency of opening a cafe. This initiative may be rather costly: we are supposed to buy new equipment, to hire new personnel, to arrange cooking and so on. As it follows from the memo, Monarch Books have no experience in such projects, so far. Because of that, costs can be higher due to mistakes and need for additional training. In other words, the second question is connected to calculating: will revenue increase exceed costs of opening and operating a café.
Thirdly, discontinuing the children's book section may have pernicious effect on volume of sales. On the one hand, decline in the percentage of the population under age ten and sales of children books have no close correlation. It is quite possible that in future parents will buy a greater number of books and/or books that are more expensive. On the other hand, according to the recommendation, wide selection of books on all subjects is the reason that Monarch Books has a large customer base. Therefore, we can assume that at least some customers prefer this bookstore because of its children books section. Summing up, the third question that need to be answered is: how will discontinuing the children's book section affect customers? If it causes considerable drop in sales, Monarch Books will not achieve the goal of opening a café.
To conclude, the Board of Directors should examine consequences of opening a café more thoroughly. The questions mentioned above can help the Board of Directors to make weighted decision and avoid critical risks of this venture.
2
0
Others prefer to have a cat as a pet. Which do you prefer?
I prefer to have a cat as a pet. Actually, I do have a cat. I gave much thought on this matter at the time. That was my deliberate choice. No one disputes that both cats and dogs have nice characteristics as pets. They bring much fun into lives of their owners. They teach children how to love and take care of a little creature. They distract us when we have a bad day, remind us to value the moment. However, I like cats more than dogs.
First, having a cat is more convenient for me. I’m at work for the great part the of the day. A cat can stay at home all day long; there is no need to walk with it several times a day. It can sleep or entertain itself watching birds and people through window. In other words, cats are less demanding for their owners’ attention.
Second, usually cats eat much less food than dogs do. Cats need less space and almost no special equipment. Very often dogs should be trained to be safe for other dogs and people. These training are provided by experts and can be quite expensive. Therefore, from financial point of view having a cat is more economical.
Third, nothing compares to a cat’s purring. It’s the most pleasant sound in the world. Some scientists believe that it can even hill owners of cats. Every night my cat comes to my bed before sleep and gives several minutes of purring. It might be the main reason I came to the decision to take a cat into my house.
Some people say that a cat can never be such a friend as a dog can. I partly agree with that opinion. Nevertheless, I think many cats, including mine, are just a little more enclosed friends, feeling affection but not showing it openly. I have never regretted my decision to take a cat.
2
1
