How can I say 'I want you to take a seat' in German? Ich will dir, Platz zu nehmen? Ich will, du Platz nehmen? or something else? It seems grammatical structure is different with English. So I couldn't know How can I say 'I want you to~' in German. How can I say that? If I want to know further, with which keyword I should search on a internet? I searched causative verb, but I didn't seem what I was seeking Waiting for your help. Thank you!

um zu = zum ? I knew zum as zu + dem, but today I saw these sentence. Ein Messer kann man zum Schneiden, zum Werfen, zum Essen oder zum schälen benutze Zum Spielen braucht der Klavierspieler ein Klavier. Um zu spielen, braucht er ein Klavier Damit er spielen kann, braucht er ein Klavier 1. Is this zum that I already knew?(zu + dem) Then, why 'Schneiden' and 'Spielen' are dative? 2. Or, does 'zum' have other role as a conjunction? I didn't find any other meaning in a dictionary. I'm totally confused. Waiting for your help. Thanks :)

haben ... fahren lassen, haben ... gelassen 1. Why 'lassen' is used instead of 'gelassen' here? Nach ihrer Führerscheinprüfung hat er seine Tochter den Wagen fahren lassen. 2. What's the difference between 'lassen from 1.' and 'gelassen from 2.'? Sie sucht die Schlüssel, aber sie hat sie leider zu Hause gelassen. 3. lassen oder gelassen with these sentences?, and what's the difference? Die Großmutter hat die Kinder abends lange fernsehen ____ Der Maler hat sich für das neue Bild viel Zeit ____ Sie haben das Bild mit dem Hirsch nur noch einen Tag nach Tante Margas Besuch hängen ____ Er hat seine Antwort offen ____ All I knew is 1) 'gelassen' is Perfekt form of 'lassen' 2) when 'lassen' is main verb, the second verb can be used without zu 3) when 'haben' is main verb, it usually means Perfekt and second verb should be used as p.p And 1. doesn't make sense with any of it. I would like to know what i'm missing is Waiting for your help. Thanks :)

Questions about Konjunktiv II 1. When I say 'Er würde eine große Tasse Kaffe mit Milch trinken' does it mean a) or b)? a) He maybe drinks a big cup of coffee with milk b) He would like to drink a big cup of coffee with milk 2. When I say 'Es ist Montag, aber er träumt, es wäre Sonntag' does it mean a) or b)? a) It's monday, but he dreamed it was Sunday (In his dream, it was sunday) b) It's monday, but he dreamed(he wished), it would be sunnday (He wished(dreamed) if it's sunday) 3. It seems there are two functions for Konjunktiv the first one is the sunjunctive(maybe) and the second one is expressing the will 'someone would be / someone would like to' then how can I distinguish the use of Konjuntiv II? I'm quite confused. Waiting for your help. Thanks :)

Complex sentence and relative pronouns Man suchte ein Verkehrsmittel, das möglichst schnell Personen von einem Stadtteil in 'den' anderen bringen konnte, ohne 'den' restlichen Verkehr zu stören I'm little confused with this sentence. I can't understand the sentence clearly. Is it saying that 'Man find a transport that can bring man fast from a somewhere to another, without ...?' I couldn't find the clear meaning of second sentence, and what 'den' refers at the final sentence. Can someone tell me the right meaning of those three sentences and for which are two 'den' referring? Waiting for your help. Thanks :)

stecken vs stecken bleiben Infinitive without zu is used in following sentence. Die Frau will den Schlüssel ins Schloss stecken, doch er passt nicht richtig und bleibt nicht stecken As I think, 'stecken' is enough, but why did writer use 'bleiben stecken'? In dictionary there was no difference of meaning. Is it just a same meaning and both are okay or there's a grammatical difference that I don't know? (and I couldn't use 'stecken' instead of 'stecken bleiben'?) Waiting for your help. Thanks :)

Wem ist es langweilig? Wem ist es langweilig? I can't understand this sentence clearly. I guess it's meaning 'Who is bored?' because after that sentence 'Mir ist es langweilig' is following. But why did 'Wem' use instead of saying 'Wer wird langweilte?' (This is the literal translation of 'Who is bored?' I made referring dictionary. I know it's not perfect. The point is, why they are using dativ case instead of using the passive? It seems making a sentence with passive is more easy, Is there any grammar rules which I don't know?) Waiting for your help. Thanks :)

Im Cafe ist nur noch ''wenig'' Platz Im Cafe ist nur noch ''wenig'' Platz 'wenig Platz' is nominative(becasue sein is the verb of the sentence) without definite article, Platz is masculine noun. So 'wenig' should have '-er' in the ending. (That what normally adjective gets without definite article in front of masculine noun) So I think it should be 'weniger Platz', although I myself feel it's awkward. Could anyone tell me why that sentence is ignoring the rule about ending of adjective?? +) Wie viel Zeit habt ihr. Also this sentence. accusative and feminine. But why not viele?

The meaning of 'wenn' in this sentence. Ständig kauft sie neue Sachen und findet es toll, wenn sie jeden Tag ihre private Modenschau machen kann I can't understand the context of this sentence. I knew 'wenn' as the meaning of 'if' or 'when' But I think it doesn't make sense in here. Constantly she purchases new things and think it awesome if she can make her private fashion show everyday..? I think also 'when' doesn't make sense. If the writer aimed to use when, then it should be She can make her private fashionshow, whenever she wants. and this sentences would be different with the one I mentioned previously. What's the meaning of 'wenn' in here and the sentence?