多彩な 英語 講師陣から検索…
投稿
Check an essay, please. Thank u)
Some people think that government should give more money to railways than to roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays the public transport is an essential part of human life. However, sometimes people arouse huge disputes regarding an unequal distribution of government budget on railways and roads. As for me, every branch of public transport deserves to be paid attention to.
It goes without saying, that cars today are considered to be the most convenient type of transport. They are used on daily basis to get from one point of destination to another one both within a city or town and outside them. Besides, on condition that one’s budget does not quite stretch to purchase a car, there is no other alternative than to use public transport which is represented by a wide range of buses, trams or trolleys. Therefore, an issue of providing a good quality of roads cannot be overestimated. Unfortunately, while in densely populated cities in Ukraine the roadways are renovated regularly, in small villages or on main country rods a situation deserves better. This fact is backed up by road statistic figures which prove a car to be the most dangerous type of transport.
Conversely, a train is regarded to be the safest and cheapest type of transport today. It is not only appropriate for all age groups including retired people or toddlers who can easily be nauseous in cars but is used widely during some crisis situations, especially when winter storms hamper the traffic considerably. Such significance of railway transport for society determines the necessity of taking regular measures and seizing the control by a government regarding the state of railway roads. Unconscientious and ill-timed actions of a government aimed at improving the railway roads can lead to dire consequences such as huge disasters with a high casualty rate and breach of trust of the society to the authorities.
To sum up, I strongly believe that both roads and railways require close attention and regular funding of a government. It is due to the fact that a state of public transport makes a huge impact on people living condition and their relation to a government.
2
0
Again graph, again help:)
The line graph outlines the approximate number of the emissions of CO2 per person in 4 European countries over the period from 1967 to 2007.
A glance at the graph reveals that countries with the lowest level of CO2 emissions at the onset, i.e. Portugal and Italy, sharply surged their numbers. For instance, Portugal accounting for less than 2 metric tonnes in 1967, reached approximately 6 tonnes in 40 years. Turning back to Italy, the number of emissions in this country, starting from just over 4 tonnes, virtually doubled its figures over the given period. Whilst these two countries demonstrated a ceiling trend, the UK with the biggest proportion of emissions of 11 tonnes, sequentially plunged its figures by roughly 3 tonnes.
Turning to Sweden, it is crystal clear that its numbers were fluctuating during the whole time. Demonstrating quite high indexes of emissions in 1967, it was sharply rocketing and reached an all-time high of almost 11 tonnes in 10 years. However, over the next decade, it took a nosedive by 5 tonnes and afterward showed a moderate decrease to roughly 6 tonnes. Thus, in 2007 the number of emissions in Sweden and Portugal was equal.
To sum up, it can be concluded that such countries as Portugal and Spain depicted a ceiling tendency. Conversely, the UK represented a descending trend as well as Sweden after having had a definite period of vacillations.
2018年3月31日
5
0
このコンテンツはitalki Community のガイドラインに違反しています。2018年3月20日
3
0
Hi. Check my graph please:)
The pie charts delineate the data about a number of British students who were able to communicate in other languages apart from English in 2000 and 2010.
As the overall trend, it can be deduced that the proportion of young people speaking only English decreased by half reaching 10% in 2010. The same tendency is demonstrated by speakers of another language.
It is conspicuous that Spanish was the most widespread second language during both periods, slightly surging their figures from 30% to 35% in 2010. Such an upward tendency by 5% depict French speakers with a moderate increase to 20% and students who mastered two other languages accounting for 15% in 2010.
It is worth noticing that despite the lucid changes in other figures, the percentage of students communicating German remained plateau over the whole period and did not exceed a tiny fraction of 5%.
All in all, it can be seen that while the general number of students who could not speak any other languages as well as those who knew another language progressively went down, Spanish and French speakers alongside with those who spoke two languages outlined the ceiling tendency. However, it is the German language which prevailed constituency during the provided periods.
2018年3月19日
2
1
