[Gedeactiveerde gebruiker]
I think that article 9 of the Japanese Constitution should be revised because we should be able to protect our own country. But now, Japan is partly dependent on the U.S. What if the U.S could not afford to protect Japan, if a crisis happened? I think Japan should have the strength to protect even if it is only Japan. Also, a growing number of Japanese people favor revising the Constitution. I think it would be a good idea to incorporate the opinions of the public and revise it. However, we must never go to war. Therefore, Japan need to continue to tell the story of the tragedy of War. I think the most important thing is the safety of the people. Is it safe to give up nuclear weapons completely? I don't think so. In fact, Japan's neighbors have weapons. Moreover, Japan is taking minimal measures to resist, so article 9 of the Japanese Constitution's definition is a little bit vague. This is a difficult problem. As a result, I think that article 9 of the Japanese Constitution should be revised. By the way, what do you think about this thema? This is a good opportunity, so please tell me your opinion.
28 nov. 2023 03:04
Correcties · 1
1
I think that article 9 of the Japanese Constitution should be revised because we should be able to protect our own country. Right now, Japan is partly dependent on the U.S. What if the U.S could not afford to protect Japan if a crisis happened? I think Japan should have the strength to protect itself. Also, a growing number of Japanese people favor revising the Constitution. I think it would be a good idea to incorporate the opinions of the public and revise it. However, its important that we never go to war. Therefore, Japan needs to continue to tell the story of the tragedy of war. I think the most important thing is the safety of the people. Is it safe to give up nuclear weapons completely? I don't think so. In fact, Japan's neighbors have weapons. Moreover, Japan is taking minimal measures to resist, so article 9 of the Japanese Constitution's definition is a little bit vague. This is a difficult problem. Therefore, I think that article 9 of the Japanese Constitution should be revised. By the way, what do you think about this theme? This is a good opportunity, so please tell me your opinion.
I had trouble understanding this sentence: Japan is taking minimal measures to resist, so article 9 of the Japanese Constitution's definition is a little bit vague. What is Japan taking minimal measures to resist? Very interesting topic. I don't know much about the Japanese Constitution so thanks for sharing!
3 december 2023
Wil je sneller vooruitgang boeken?
Word nu lid van deze leer-community en probeer de gratis oefeningen uit!