Zoek tussen verschillende Engels docenten...
Alexander
Is it correct that in “I wouldn't be sure that it was profitable in 5 years” we don't need the second “would” when talking about the future relative to “be sure”?
2 aug. 2026 04:40
Antwoorden · 12
2
Yes, that's correct.
After expressions such as "I wouldn't be sure", "I don't think", or "I doubt", we often use the past tense to refer to a future situation from the speaker's point of view.
So:
"I wouldn't be sure that it was profitable in five years."
is perfectly natural.
You could also say:
"I wouldn't be sure that it would be profitable in five years."
if you want to emphasise the future outcome itself, but the second "would" is optional rather than required.
In other words, the first version is completely grammatical and is probably the more natural choice in everyday English.
2 aug. 2026 17:04
1
I agree with Gareth Todd.
2 aug. 2026 17:33
1
Your phrase is okay but native speakers might say "I'm not sure that it will be profitable in 5 years."
That's right, no 2nd would needed.
2 aug. 2026 08:19
Heb je je antwoorden nog steeds niet gevonden?
Schrijf je vragen op en laat de moedertaalsprekers je helpen!
Alexander
Taalvaardigheden
Engels, Oekraïens
Taal die wordt geleerd
Engels
Artikelen die je misschien ook leuk vindt

How to Work Effectively with International Teams
10 likes · 2 Opmerkingen

Why Do People Still Ask You to Repeat Yourself?
21 likes · 11 Opmerkingen

Why Your English Textbooks Didn’t Prepare You for Fast-Paced Meetings
18 likes · 8 Opmerkingen
Meer artikelen
